Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915/huc: Add HuC fw loading support

2016-12-01 Thread Srivatsa, Anusha
>-Original Message- >From: Tvrtko Ursulin [mailto:tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com] >Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 5:24 AM >To: Srivatsa, Anusha ; intel- >g...@lists.freedesktop.org >Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915/huc: Add HuC fw loading support > >Hi, > >On 30/11/2016 23:

[Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm: Enable dynamic debug for DRM_[DEV]_DEBUG*

2016-12-01 Thread Robert Bragg
I'm currently considering the use of DRM_ERROR in i915 perf for steam config validation errors (i.e. userspace misconfigurations) that should be changed so that i-g-t tests aren't treated as failures when triggering these. I initially proposed changing these to DRM_INFO messages and intentionally

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/perf: use DRM_DEBUG for userspace issues

2016-12-01 Thread Robert Bragg
Avoid using DRM_ERROR for conditions userspace can trigger with a bad config when opening a stream or from not reading data in a timely fashion (whereby the OA buffer fills up). These conditions are tested by i-g-t which treats error messages as failures if using the test runner. This wasn't an iss

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915: Make GEM object create and create from data take dev_priv

2016-12-01 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 02:16:37PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > From: Tvrtko Ursulin > > Makes all GEM object constructors consistent. > > v2: Fix compilation in GVT code. > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson (v1) > Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen (v1) Still lgtm to

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: dev_priv cleanup in bridge/bar/mmio init code

2016-12-01 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 02:16:40PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > From: Tvrtko Ursulin > > dev_priv is more appropriate for these so converting saves > some lines of source. > > v2: Commit message and keep the pdev local variable. (Joonas Lahtinen) > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin > Reviewed-

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm: Enable dynamic debug for DRM_[DEV]_DEBUG*

2016-12-01 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm: Enable dynamic debug for DRM_[DEV]_DEBUG* URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/16235/ State : success == Summary == Series 16235v1 drm: Enable dynamic debug for DRM_[DEV]_DEBUG* https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/16235/revisions/1/mbox/

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for GEM object create and driver init dev_priv cleanups (rev2)

2016-12-01 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 01/12/2016 14:45, Patchwork wrote: == Series Details == Series: GEM object create and driver init dev_priv cleanups (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/16162/ State : warning == Summary == Series 16162v2 GEM object create and driver init dev_priv cleanups https://patchw

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/perf: use DRM_DEBUG for userspace issues

2016-12-01 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/perf: use DRM_DEBUG for userspace issues URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/16236/ State : success == Summary == Series 16236v1 drm/i915/perf: use DRM_DEBUG for userspace issues https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/16236/revisions/1

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915/huc: Unified css_header struct for GuC and HuC

2016-12-01 Thread Srivatsa, Anusha
>-Original Message- >From: Hiler, Arkadiusz >Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 4:23 AM >To: Srivatsa, Anusha >Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Mcgee, Jeff ; >Kamble, Sagar A >Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915/huc: Unified css_header struct >for >GuC and HuC > >On Wed, No

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm: Add a new connector atomic property for link status

2016-12-01 Thread Manasi Navare
Sean, could you please review this patch, I have tried to address all the comments from you. Regards Manasi On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:30:31PM -0800, Manasi Navare wrote: > At the time userspace does setcrtc, we've already promised the mode > would work. The promise is based on the theoretical ca

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm: Add a new connector atomic property for link status

2016-12-01 Thread Sean Paul
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Manasi Navare wrote: > Sean, could you please review this patch, I have tried to address > all the comments from you. > Comments look good to me. Reviewed-by: Sean Paul Sean > Regards > Manasi > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:30:31PM -0800, Manasi Navare wrote: >

[Intel-gfx] [drm-intel:drm-intel-next-queued 3/10] htmldocs: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c:779: warning: No description found for parameter 'dev_priv'

2016-12-01 Thread kbuild test robot
tree: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel drm-intel-next-queued head: 192aa18142b28fdcb63b12984e02466ced382a54 commit: bf9e8429ab9747f584e692bad52a7a9f1787a4da [3/10] drm/i915: Make various init functions take dev_priv reproduce: make htmldocs All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): m

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/18] drm/i915/dsi: Fix / cleanup dsi enable / disable sequences

2016-12-01 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi All, So while trying to fix my cherrytrail tablet's screen sometimes not initializing properly (*) I started working on this series to cleanup / (minor) refactor the dsi enable / disable code, with as goal to then change it to match the enable / disable sequences which Ville Syrjälä recently du

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/18] drm/i915/dsi: Fix swapping of MIPI_SEQ_DEASSERT_RESET / MIPI_SEQ_ASSERT_RESET

2016-12-01 Thread Hans de Goede
Looking at the ADF code from the Android kernel sources for a cherrytrail tablet I noticed that it is calling the MIPI_SEQ_ASSERT_RESET sequence from the panel prepare hook. Until commit b1cb1bd29189 ("drm/i915/dsi: update reset and power sequences in panel prepare/unprepare hooks") the mainline i

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/18] drm/i915/dsi: Fix chv_exec_gpio disabling the GPIOs it is setting

2016-12-01 Thread Hans de Goede
Set the CHV_GPIO_GPIOEN bit when updating GPIOs from chv_exec_gpio. Fixes: a0a6d4ffd2ad ("drm/i915/dsi: add support for gpio elements on CHV") Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jani Nikula Cc: Ville Syrjälä Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ds

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/18] drm/i915/dsi: Move calling of wait_for_dsi_fifo_empty to mipi_exec_send_packet

2016-12-01 Thread Hans de Goede
Instead of calling wait_for_dsi_fifo_empty on all dsi ports after calling a drm_panel_foo helper which calls VBT sequences, move it to the VBT mipi_exec_send_packet helper, which is the one VBT instruction which actually puts data in the fifo. This results in a nice cleanup making it clearer what

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/18] drm/i915/dsi: Move intel_dsi_clear_device_ready()

2016-12-01 Thread Hans de Goede
Move the intel_dsi_clear_device_ready() function to higher up in intel_dsi.c this pairs it with intel_dsi_device_ready(); and pairs intel_dsi_*enable* with intel_dsi_*disable without intel_dsi_clear_device_ready() sitting in the middle of them. This commit purely moves code around, it does not mak

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/18] drm/i915/dsi: Make intel_dsi_enable/disable directly exec VBT sequences

2016-12-01 Thread Hans de Goede
The drm_panel_enable/disable and drm_panel_prepare/unprepare calls are not fine grained enough to abstract all the different steps we need to take (and VBT sequences we need to exec) properly. So simply remove the panel _enable/disable and prepare/unprepare callbacks and instead export intel_dsi_ex

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/18] drm/i915/dsi: Merge intel_dsi_disable/enable into their respective callers

2016-12-01 Thread Hans de Goede
intel_dsi_disable/enable only have one caller, merge them into their respective callers. Change msleep(2) into usleep_range(2000, 5000) to make checkpatch happy, otherwise no funtional changes. The main advantage of this change is that it makes it easier to follow all the steps of the panel enabl

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/18] drm/i915/dsi: Add intel_dsi_unprepare() helper

2016-12-01 Thread Hans de Goede
The enable path has an intel_dsi_prepare() helper which prepares various registers for the mode-set. Move the function undoing this to a new intel_dsi_unprepare() helper for better symmetry between the enable and disable paths. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede --- drivers/gpu/

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/18] drm/i915/dsi: Move MIPI_SEQ_POWER_ON/OFF calls together with pmic gpio calls

2016-12-01 Thread Hans de Goede
Now that we are no longer bound to the drm_panel_ callbacks, call MIPI_SEQ_POWER_ON/OFF at the proper place. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 10 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/18] drm/i915/dsi: Document the panel enable / disable sequences from the spec

2016-12-01 Thread Hans de Goede
Document the DSI panel enable / disable sequences from the spec, for easy comparison between the code and the spec. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 64 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/18] drm/i915/dsi: Move disable pll call outside of clear_device_ready()

2016-12-01 Thread Hans de Goede
On enable intel_dsi_enable() directly calls intel_enable_dsi_pll(), make intel_dsi_disable() also directly call intel_disable_dsi_pll(), rather then hiding the call in intel_dsi_clear_device_ready(), no functional changes. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 4 ++-

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/18] drm/i915/dsi: Drop bogus MIPI_SEQ_ASSERT_RESET before POWER_ON

2016-12-01 Thread Hans de Goede
MIPI_SEQ_ASSERT_RESET before POWER_ON is not necessary for 2 reasons: 1) The reset should already be asserted before intel_dsi_pre_enable() gets called 2) Most (some?) VBTs will ensure reset was asserted in their MIPI_SEQ_DEASSERT_RESET themselves Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede --- drivers/g

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/18] drm/i915/dsi: Group DPOunit clock gate workaround with PLL enable

2016-12-01 Thread Hans de Goede
Move the DPOunit clock gate workaround to directly after the PLL enable. The exact location of the workaround does not matter and there are 2 reasons to group it with the PLL enable: 1) This moves it out of the middle of the init sequence from the spec, making it easier to follow the init sequ

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/18] drm/i915/dsi: Execute MIPI_SEQ_DEASSERT_RESET before calling device_ready()

2016-12-01 Thread Hans de Goede
Execute MIPI_SEQ_DEASSERT_RESET before putting the device in ready state (LP-11), this is the sequence in which things should be done according to the spec. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 9 +++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --gi

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/18] drm/i915/dsi: Document always using v3 SHUTDOWN / MIPI_SEQ_DISPLAY_OFF order

2016-12-01 Thread Hans de Goede
According to the spec for v2 VBTs we should call MIPI_SEQ_DISPLAY_OFF before sending SHUTDOWN, where as for v3 VBTs we should send SHUTDOWN first. Since the v2 order has known issues, we use the v3 order everywhere, add a comment documenting this. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede --- drivers/gpu/dr

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/18] drm/i915/dsi: Call MIPI_SEQ_TEAR_ON and DISPLAY_ON for cmd-mode (untested)

2016-12-01 Thread Hans de Goede
According to the spec we should call MIPI_SEQ_TEAR_ON and DISPLAY_ON on enable for cmd-mode, just like we already call their counterparts on disable. Note: untested, my panel is a vid-mode panel. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertio

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/18] drm/i915/dsi: Execute MIPI_SEQ_TEAR_OFF from intel_dsi_post_disable

2016-12-01 Thread Hans de Goede
For v3 VBTs we should call MIPI_SEQ_TEAR_OFF before MIPI_SEQ_DISPLAY_OFF, for non v3 VBTs this is a nop. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c index

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/18] drm/i915/dsi: Group MIPI_SEQ_BACKLIGHT_ON/OFF with panel_[en|dis]able_backlight

2016-12-01 Thread Hans de Goede
Execute the MIPI_SEQ_BACKLIGHT_ON/OFF VBT sequences at the same time as we call intel_panel_enable_backlight() / intel_panel_disable_backlight(). Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gp

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/18] drm/i915/dsi: Skip delays for v3 VBTs in vid-mode

2016-12-01 Thread Hans de Goede
For v3 VBTs in vid-mode the delays are part of the VBT sequences, so we should not also delay ourselves otherwise we get double delays. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 19 +++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drive

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for GEM object create and driver init dev_priv cleanups (rev2)

2016-12-01 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 06:08:25PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > Merged to dinq. Thanks for the review! (And for spotting all the > places where it is needed.) :) Oops, better run make htmldocs and catch the important information that intel_guc_fini() takes dev_priv. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Int

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: problems fetching the drm-intel, etc trees

2016-12-01 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Daniel, On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:02:26 + Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Nov 30 2016, at 10:49 pm, Rob Clark wrote: > > > yeah, {cgit,anongit}.fd.o have been having problems all day.. (the ssh > git urls for folks who have push access work fine).. although it has > worked for me a coupl

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: problems fetching the drm-intel, etc trees

2016-12-01 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi Stephen, On 1 December 2016 at 20:45, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:02:26 + Daniel Stone wrote: >> Sorry about this, it is quite bad. I think having mirrors for the key DRM >> trees on GitHub is a good idea though, and I can get to setting that up. >> Stephen, you need

[Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Provide a hook for selftests

2016-12-01 Thread Chris Wilson
Some pieces of code are independent of hardware but are very tricky to exercise through the normal userspace ABI or via debugfs hooks. Being able to create mock unit tests and execute them through CI is vital. Start by adding a central point where we can execute unit tests from and a parameter to e

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 0/4 v7] Convert sh scripts to C variants.

2016-12-01 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 02:23:54PM +0200, Marius Vlad wrote: > Latest changes include addressing comments from previous version and include > some notes about driver loading/unloading when using in combination to > drm_open_driver(). Pushed the first 2 since I had an ulterior motive in writing a i

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Provide a hook for selftests

2016-12-01 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:32:44PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > To facilitate integration with igt, any parameter beginning with > i915.subtest__ is interpreted as a selftest subtest executable > independently via igt/drv_selftest. > > +#define selftest(name, func) \ > +module_param_named(subtest_

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/15] drm/i915/glk: Configure number of sprite planes properly

2016-12-01 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 05:23:20PM +0200, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote: > Geminilake has 4 planes (3 sprites) per pipe. > > Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira > > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 5 - > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/15] drm/i915/glk: Implement core display init/uninit sequence for geminilake

2016-12-01 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 05:23:19PM +0200, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote: > The sequence is pretty much the same as broxton, except that bspec > requires the AUX domains to be enabled. But since those can't be enabled > before the phys are initialized, we just use t

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/15] drm/i915/glk: Allow dotclock up to 2 * cdclk on geminilake

2016-12-01 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 05:23:18PM +0200, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote: > Geminilake has double wide pipes so it can output two pixels per CD > clock. > > Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira > > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 10 ++

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Provide a hook for selftests

2016-12-01 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Provide a hook for selftests URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/16246/ State : success == Summary == Series 16246v1 drm/i915: Provide a hook for selftests https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/16246/revisions/1/mbox/ Test kms_force

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/15] drm/i915/glk: Reuse broxton's cdclk code for GLK

2016-12-01 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 05:23:17PM +0200, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote: > Geminilake has the same register layout, reference clock and programming > sequence as broxton. The difference is that it doesn't support the 1.5 > divider and has different ratios, but a lo

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/15] drm/i915/glk: Update Port PLL enable sequence for Geminilkae

2016-12-01 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 05:23:16PM +0200, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote: > From: Madhav Chauhan > > Add steps for enabling and disabling Port PLL as per bspec. > > Signed-off-by: Madhav Chauhan > Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira > > --- > drivers/g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/15] drm/i915/glk: Add power wells for Geminilake

2016-12-01 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 05:23:13PM +0200, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote: > Geminilake has power wells are similar to SKL, but with the misc IO well > being split into separate AUX IO wells. > > Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira > > --- > drivers/gpu/dr

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/15] drm/i915/glk: Set DDI PHY lane lane optimization for Geminilake too

2016-12-01 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
This could be squashed to the other bit patch with s/broxton/gen9_lp... but anyway Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 05:23:12PM +0200, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote: > Geminilake uses the same lane latency optimization masks and registers > as Broxton, so reuse the code wi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/15] drm/i915/glk: Force DDI initialization.

2016-12-01 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
This could also be squashed or reviewed-by you... either works for me, I just cannot review the patch that I'm listed as author ;) On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 05:23:11PM +0200, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote: > From: Rodrigo Vivi > > As for BXT, GLK doesn't support port detection through SFUSE_S

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915/glk: Reuse broxton code for geminilake

2016-12-01 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
A reviewed backwards because I was willing to check if all ifs were in place. I missed the ones from i915_drv.c *** i915_drv.c: i915_drm_suspend_late[1500]fw_csr = !IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) && i915_drm_suspend_late[1513]if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) i915_drm_resume_early[1721]if (IS_GEN9_LP(d

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Calculate common rates and max lane count in Long pulse handler

2016-12-01 Thread Manasi Navare
Supported link rate common to source and sink as well as the maximum supported lane count based on source and sink capabilities should be set only once on hotplug and then used anytime they are requested. This patch creates and array of common rates and max lane count as the intel_dp member. It get

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915: Calculate common rates and max lane count in Long pulse handler

2016-12-01 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Calculate common rates and max lane count in Long pulse handler URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/16250/ State : warning == Summary == Series 16250v1 drm/i915: Calculate common rates and max lane count in Long pulse handler https://patchwor

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/audio: extend audio sync rate support for DP MST

2016-12-01 Thread Yang, Libin
Any comments? Thanks. Regards, Libin >-Original Message- >From: Yang, Libin >Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 1:17 PM >To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; jani.nik...@linux.intel.com; >ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com; Vetter, Daniel ; >Pandiyan, Dhinakaran ; ti...@suse.de >Cc: Yang, Libin

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 0/3] Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem for drm subsystem

2016-12-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 01:44:14PM +0530, swati.dhin...@intel.com wrote: > From: Swati Dhingra > > Currently, for the purpose of providing output debug/loggging/crc and various > other kinds of data from DRM layer to userspace, we don't have a standard > filesystem, which would suffice for all th

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 1/3] fs: Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem interfaces

2016-12-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 01:44:15PM +0530, swati.dhin...@intel.com wrote: > From: Swati Dhingra > > The patch introduces a new pseudo filesystem type, named 'drmfs' which is > intended to house the files for the data generated by drm subsystem that > cannot be accommodated by any of the existing f

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix intel_psr_init() kerneldoc

2016-12-01 Thread Conselvan De Oliveira, Ander
On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 13:48 +0200, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote: > In commit c39055b072f8 ("drm/i915: Pass dev_priv to > intel_setup_outputs()"), I forgot to update the kerneldoc for > intel_psr_init() init, leading to warnings when building the > documentation: > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 2/3] drm: Register drmfs filesystem from drm init

2016-12-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 01:44:16PM +0530, swati.dhin...@intel.com wrote: > From: Swati Dhingra > > During drm module initialization, drm_core_init initializes the drmfs > filesystem and register this with kernel. A driver specific directory is > created > inside drmfs root, and dentry of this di

<    1   2