Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/dsi: silence a warning about uninitialized return value

2016-10-23 Thread Nicolas Iooss
Hello, I sent the patch below a few weeks ago. I got some comments (cf. [1]) which looked good, but the patch has not been merged in linux-next yet. Do I need to fix something (like rewrite the commit message) in order to get it merged? Thanks, Nicolas [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/dsi: silence a warning about uninitialized return value

2016-10-23 Thread Chris Wilson
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 06:55:58PM +0200, Nicolas Iooss wrote: > Hello, > > I sent the patch below a few weeks ago. I got some comments (cf. [1]) > which looked good, but the patch has not been merged in linux-next yet. > Do I need to fix something (like rewrite the commit message) in order to > g

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with the drm-intel tree

2016-10-23 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the drm-misc tree got a conflict in: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c between commit: 1186fa85eb9b ("drm/i915/gen9: minimum scanlines for Y tile is not always 4") from the drm-intel tree and commit: bd2ef25d921c ("drm: Add drm_rotation_90_or_270()") f

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

2016-10-23 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h:32:0, from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:36: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c: In function 'intel_primary_pl

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915/gvt: fix compilation errors in gtt.c

2016-10-23 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2016.10.20 18:05:56 -0400, Jérémy Lefaure wrote: > This series fixes 2 compilations errors in gvt/gtt.c on 32-bits platform: > [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/gvt: fix bad 32 bit shift in gtt > [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/gvt: fix an error string format > > The file gtt.c still does not compile because of shif

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: Give write permission to gt_boost_freq_mhz

2016-10-23 Thread Sagar Arun Kamble
Cc: Chris Wilson Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c index 47590ab..3df8d3d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/1] drm/i915: Give write permission to gt_boost_freq_mhz

2016-10-23 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/1] drm/i915: Give write permission to gt_boost_freq_mhz URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/14228/ State : success == Summary == Series 14228v1 Series without cover letter https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/14228/re

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm: Add atomic helper to redo a modeset on current mode

2016-10-23 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 05:46:30PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 04:01:14PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 10:47:25AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 04:45:39PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote: > > > > This function provides a wa

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm: Add atomic helper to redo a modeset on current mode

2016-10-23 Thread Manasi Navare
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 08:00:10AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 05:46:30PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 04:01:14PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 10:47:25AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 04:

[Intel-gfx] Updated drm-intel-testing

2016-10-23 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi all, New -testing cycle with cool stuff: - first slice of the gvt device model (Zhenyu et al) - compression support for gpu error states (Chris) - sunset clause on gpu errors resulting in dmesg noise telling users how to report them - .rodata diet from Tvrtko - switch over lots of macros to o

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm: Add atomic helper to redo a modeset on current mode

2016-10-23 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 11:12:31PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 08:00:10AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 05:46:30PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 04:01:14PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 10:

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/1] drm/i915: Update only cur_freq without setting RPNSWREQ when device is suspended

2016-10-23 Thread Sagar Arun Kamble
If min/max frequency is updated from debugfs/sysfs and device is suspended, just update the driver tracking state cur_freq and it will come into effect when HW becomes busy next. v2: Folded awake check into if/else. (Jon) Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble --- drivers

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm: Add atomic helper to redo a modeset on current mode

2016-10-23 Thread Manasi Navare
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 08:33:10AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 11:12:31PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 08:00:10AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 05:46:30PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 04: