[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/guc: Decouple GuC engine id from ring id

2016-01-23 Thread Patchwork
== Summary == Built on 8fe9e785ae04fa7c37f7935cff12d62e38054b60 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-01m-21d-11h-02m-42s UTC integration manifest bdw-nuci7total:140 pass:131 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:9 bdw-ultratotal:143 pass:137 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:6 bsw-nuc-2

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: edp resume/On time optimization. (rev10)

2016-01-23 Thread Patchwork
== Summary == Built on 8fe9e785ae04fa7c37f7935cff12d62e38054b60 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-01m-21d-11h-02m-42s UTC integration manifest Test gem_ctx_basic: pass -> FAIL (bdw-ultra) Test kms_flip: Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms: pass -> DMESG-W

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't ERROR for an expected intel_rcs_ctx_init() interruption

2016-01-23 Thread Chris Wilson
intel_rcs_ctx_init() can be interrupted by a signal (if it has to wait upon a full ring to advance). Don't emit an error for this. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Decouple GuC engine id from ring id

2016-01-23 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 03:06:28PM -0800, yu@intel.com wrote: > From: Alex Dai > > Previously GuC uses ring id as engine id because of same definition. > But this is not true since this commit: > > commit de1add360522c876c25ef2ab1c94bdb509ab > Author: Tvrtko Ursulin > Date: Fri Jan 15

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Decouple GuC engine id from ring id

2016-01-23 Thread Yu Dai
On 01/23/2016 10:25 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 03:06:28PM -0800, yu@intel.com wrote: > From: Alex Dai > > Previously GuC uses ring id as engine id because of same definition. > But this is not true since this commit: > > commit de1add360522c876c25ef2ab1c94bdb509ab

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/guc: Decouple GuC engine id from ring id

2016-01-23 Thread yu . dai
From: Alex Dai Previously GuC uses ring id as engine id because of same definition. But this is not true since this commit: commit de1add360522c876c25ef2ab1c94bdb509ab Author: Tvrtko Ursulin Date: Fri Jan 15 15:12:50 2016 + drm/i915: Decouple execbuf uAPI from internal implementa

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Don't ERROR for an expected intel_rcs_ctx_init() interruption

2016-01-23 Thread Patchwork
== Summary == Built on 8fe9e785ae04fa7c37f7935cff12d62e38054b60 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-01m-21d-11h-02m-42s UTC integration manifest bdw-nuci7total:140 pass:131 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:9 bdw-ultratotal:143 pass:137 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:6 bsw-nuc-2

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915/guc: Decouple GuC engine id from ring id (rev2)

2016-01-23 Thread Patchwork
== Summary == Built on 8fe9e785ae04fa7c37f7935cff12d62e38054b60 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-01m-21d-11h-02m-42s UTC integration manifest Test kms_flip: Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset: pass -> DMESG-WARN (ilk-hp8440p) bdw-nuci7total:140 pass:131 dwarn:0 dfa