[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Add Backlight Control using DPCD for eDP connectors (v5)

2016-01-12 Thread Yetunde Adebisi
This patch adds support for eDP backlight control using DPCD registers to backlight hooks in intel_panel. It checks for backlight control over AUX channel capability and sets up function pointers to get and set the backlight brightness level if supported. v2: Moved backlight functions from intel_

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 02/38] drm/i915: Explicit power enable during deferred context initialisation

2016-01-12 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 05:59:46PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote: > On ti, 2016-01-12 at 16:35 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 02:21:51PM +, John Harrison wrote: > > > On 12/01/2016 14:04, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:50:34AM +, John Harrison wrot

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Add Backlight Control using DPCD for eDP connectors (v5)

2016-01-12 Thread Daniel Stone
On 12 January 2016 at 15:59, Yetunde Adebisi wrote: > + memset(intel_dp->edp_dpcd, 0, sizeof(intel_dp->edp_dpcd)); gcc should've warned you about this; you're memsetting too small a size. Cheers, Daniel ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gf

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915: Introduce dedicated object VMA iterator

2016-01-12 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 09:51:38AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 11/01/16 08:43, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 01:29:14PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > >> > >> On 08/01/16 11:29, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > >>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin > >>> > >>> Purpose is to catch places whic

[Intel-gfx] ✗ failure: Fi.CI.BAT

2016-01-12 Thread Patchwork
== Summary == Built on 37f6c2ae666fbba9eff4355115252b8b0fd43050 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-01m-12d-14h-25m-44s UTC integration manifest Test gem_storedw_loop: Subgroup basic-render: pass -> DMESG-WARN (skl-i5k-2) UNSTABLE dmesg-warn -> PASS (bdw-

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ warning: Fi.CI.BAT

2016-01-12 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:13:53AM -, Patchwork wrote: > == Summary == > > Built on ff88655b3a5467bbc3be8c67d3e05ebf182557d3 drm-intel-nightly: > 2016y-01m-11d-07h-30m-16s UTC integration manifest > > Test gem_storedw_loop: > Subgroup basic-render: > pass -> DME

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ failure: Fi.CI.BAT

2016-01-12 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:20:21AM -, Patchwork wrote: > == Summary == > > HEAD is now at ff88655 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-01m-11d-07h-30m-16s UTC > integration manifest > Applying: drm: kerneldoc for drm_fops.c > Repository lacks necessary blobs to fall back on 3-way merge. > Cannot fall bac

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ failure: Fi.CI.BAT

2016-01-12 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:50:28PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > Patchwork writes: > > > == Summary == > > > > Built on ff88655b3a5467bbc3be8c67d3e05ebf182557d3 drm-intel-nightly: > > 2016y-01m-11d-07h-30m-16s UTC integration manifest > > > > Test gem_storedw_loop: > > Subgroup basic-ren

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 4/7] drm/i915: Cache LRC state page in the context

2016-01-12 Thread Dave Gordon
On 12/01/16 13:11, Chris Wilson wrote: On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:54:25PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 12/01/16 12:12, Chris Wilson wrote: On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:56:11AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: From: Tvrtko Ursulin LRC lifetime is well defined so we can cache the page pointing t

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: Reorder shadow registers on gen8 for faster lookup

2016-01-12 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 05:28:24PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > The most common thing on normal operation is ring tail > pointer update. Put it first in the shadow register list for > gen8, like we do with gen9. With execlists it is not. Also BSD2? Do you have the complete list of shadowed regs

[Intel-gfx] ✓ success: Fi.CI.BAT

2016-01-12 Thread Patchwork
== Summary == Built on 37f6c2ae666fbba9eff4355115252b8b0fd43050 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-01m-12d-14h-25m-44s UTC integration manifest Test drv_module_reload_basic: Subgroup none: dmesg-warn -> PASS (skl-i5k-2) dmesg-warn -> PASS (skl-i7k-2) Tes

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✓ success: Fi.CI.BAT

2016-01-12 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:53:53AM -, Patchwork wrote: > == Summary == > > Built on ff88655b3a5467bbc3be8c67d3e05ebf182557d3 drm-intel-nightly: > 2016y-01m-11d-07h-30m-16s UTC integration manifest > > Test gem_storedw_loop: > Subgroup basic-render: > dmesg-warn -> PAS

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915: Introduce dedicated object VMA iterator

2016-01-12 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 12-01-16 om 17:19 schreef Daniel Vetter: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 09:51:38AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: >> On 11/01/16 08:43, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 01:29:14PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 08/01/16 11:29, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > From: Tvrtko Ursulin

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Only complain about n_edp_entries with eDP ports

2016-01-12 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 04:55:24PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 05:28:16PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > commit 10afa0b65fe2 ("drm/i915: Reject >9 ddi translation entried if port > > != A/E on SKL") > > added sanity checks to

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 02/38] drm/i915: Explicit power enable during deferred context initialisation

2016-01-12 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 05:11:00PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 05:59:46PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote: > > On ti, 2016-01-12 at 16:35 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 02:21:51PM +, John Harrison wrote: > > > > On 12/01/2016 14:04, Daniel Vetter wrot

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: reboot notifier delay for eDP panels

2016-01-12 Thread Clint Taylor
On 01/12/2016 05:21 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 01:52:17PM -0800, clinton.a.tay...@intel.com wrote: From: Clint Taylor Add reboot notifier for all platforms. This guarantees T12 delay compliance during reboot cycles when pre-os enables the panel within 500ms. Signed-off-b

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 066/190] drm/i915: Simplify request_alloc by returning the allocated request

2016-01-12 Thread Dave Gordon
On 11/01/16 09:17, Chris Wilson wrote: If is simpler and leads to more readable code through the callstack if the allocation returns the allocated struct through the return value. The importance of this is that it no longer looks like we accidentally allocate requests as side-effect of calling c

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/gen8: Tidy display interrupt processing

2016-01-12 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 04:04:06PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > From: Tvrtko Ursulin > > One bugfix and a few tidy-ups: > > * Pipe fault logging was broken on Gen9+. > * Removed some unnecessary local variables. > * Removed unnecessary initializers. > * Decreased pipe iir block indentation

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/gen8: Factor out display interrupt handling

2016-01-12 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 04:04:07PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > From: Tvrtko Ursulin > > Tidy quite long interrupt service routine by factoring out > the display part. > > This simplifies the exit path a little bit, makes the code > a bit more readable, and potentialy makes code reuse in the >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: Only grab timestamps when needed

2016-01-12 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 03:52:36PM +, Dave Gordon wrote: > On 11/01/16 15:04, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > > >On 11/01/16 14:36, Chris Wilson wrote: > >>On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:08:40PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > >>>From: Tvrtko Ursulin > >>> > >>>No need to call ktime_get_raw_ns twice per

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Add Backlight Control using DPCD for eDP connectors (v5)

2016-01-12 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016, Daniel Stone wrote: > On 12 January 2016 at 15:59, Yetunde Adebisi > wrote: >> + memset(intel_dp->edp_dpcd, 0, sizeof(intel_dp->edp_dpcd)); > > gcc should've warned you about this; you're memsetting too small a size. Really? I think it's fine. BR, Jani. --

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] pwm: lpss: Add intel-gfx as consumer device in lookup table

2016-01-12 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Shobhit, [auto build test ERROR on drm-intel/for-linux-next] [also build test ERROR on v4.4 next-20160112] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improving the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Shobhit-Kumar/LPSS-PWM-support-for

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Add Backlight Control using DPCD for eDP connectors (v5)

2016-01-12 Thread Daniel Stone
On 12 January 2016 at 17:18, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jan 2016, Daniel Stone wrote: >> On 12 January 2016 at 15:59, Yetunde Adebisi >> wrote: >>> + memset(intel_dp->edp_dpcd, 0, sizeof(intel_dp->edp_dpcd)); >> >> gcc should've warned you about this; you're memsetting too sm

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 055/190] drm/i915: Unify intel_logical_ring_emit and intel_ring_emit

2016-01-12 Thread Dave Gordon
On 11/01/16 09:17, Chris Wilson wrote: Both perform the same actions with more or less indirection, so just unify the code. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c| 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c| 8 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Add Backlight Control using DPCD for eDP connectors (v5)

2016-01-12 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016, Daniel Stone wrote: > On 12 January 2016 at 17:18, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Tue, 12 Jan 2016, Daniel Stone wrote: >>> On 12 January 2016 at 15:59, Yetunde Adebisi >>> wrote: + memset(intel_dp->edp_dpcd, 0, sizeof(intel_dp->edp_dpcd)); >>> >>> gcc should'

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Fix bsd2 ring name

2016-01-12 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
From: Tvrtko Ursulin Chris Wilson noticed the "bds2" typo. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: Chris Wilson --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c index 4a6ba0a4

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Extract vfunc setup from logical ring initializers

2016-01-12 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
From: Tvrtko Ursulin Majority of them was duplicated code and only render ring currently overrides some of them. We can save some lines of code and also take away the confusion on why bsd2 did not do the seqno coherency workaround. (VCS2 ring does not exist on platforms where workaround is needed

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Compact logical ring interrupt initialization

2016-01-12 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
From: Tvrtko Ursulin Identically to vfuncs interrupt mask initialization can also be compacted for more readable code. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 33 + 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/driv

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/gen8: Tidy display interrupt processing

2016-01-12 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 12/01/16 17:12, Chris Wilson wrote: On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 04:04:06PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: From: Tvrtko Ursulin One bugfix and a few tidy-ups: * Pipe fault logging was broken on Gen9+. * Removed some unnecessary local variables. * Removed unnecessary initializers. * Decre

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm: Enable markdown^Wasciidoc for gpu.tmpl

2016-01-12 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:06:17AM +, Graham Whaley wrote: > On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 09:34 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 06:12:12PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > > On Sat, 12 Dec 2015 12:13:45 +0100 > > > Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > > > > I just figured there's no

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 006/190] drm/i915: Add GEM debugging Kconfig option

2016-01-12 Thread Dave Gordon
On 11/01/16 09:16, Chris Wilson wrote: Currently there is a #define to enable extra BUG_ON for debugging requests and associated activities. I want to expand its use to cover all of GEM internals (so that we can saturate the code with asserts). We can add a Kconfig option to make it easier to ena

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915: Store rawclk_freq in dev_priv

2016-01-12 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 05:43:33PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 01 Dec 2015, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:47:41PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > >> On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > >> > From: Ville Syrjälä > >> > > >> > Generalize rawclk handl

[Intel-gfx] ✗ warning: Fi.CI.BAT

2016-01-12 Thread Patchwork
== Summary == Built on 9a47f23e3744929b9b222cb750994723fff0e5ee drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-01m-12d-16h-55m-40s UTC integration manifest Test gem_storedw_loop: Subgroup basic-render: pass -> DMESG-WARN (skl-i5k-2) UNSTABLE pass -> DMESG-WARN (bdw-

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 004/190] drm/i915: Fix some invalid requests cancellations

2016-01-12 Thread Dave Gordon
On 11/01/16 09:16, Chris Wilson wrote: As we add the VMA to the request early, it may be cancelled during execbuf reservation. This will leave the context object pointing to a dangling request; i915_wait_request() simply skips the wait and so we may unbind the object whilst it is still active.

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Pass modifier instead of tiling_mode to gen4_compute_page_offset()

2016-01-12 Thread ville . syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä In preparation for handling more than X tiling, pass the fb modifier to gen4_compute_page_offset() instead of the obj->tiling_mode. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 12 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/inte

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/7] drm/i915: Factor out intel_tile_width()

2016-01-12 Thread ville . syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Pull the tile width calculations from intel_fb_stride_alignment() into a new function intel_tile_width(). Also take the opportunity to pass aroun dev_priv instead of dev to intel_fb_stride_alignment(). v2: Reorder argumnents to be more consistent with other functions Cha

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915: Reviewed fb offsets[] prep patches

2016-01-12 Thread ville . syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Here's a repost of some already reviewed patches from my larger fb offsets[] series [1] from last year, for the sake of the CI system. [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-October/078050.html Ville Syrjälä (7): drm/i915: Pass modifier instead of tiling

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: Use intel_tile_{size, width, height}() in intel_gen4_compute_page_offset()

2016-01-12 Thread ville . syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Make intel_gen4_compute_page_offset() ready for other tiling formats besied X-tile by getting the tile dimensions through intel_tile_{size,width,height}(). Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 15 ++-

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Refactor intel_surf_alignment()

2016-01-12 Thread ville . syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Pull the code to determine the surface alignment for both linear and tiled surfaces into a separate function intel_surf_alignment(). This will be used not only for the vma alignment but actually aligning the plane SURF once SKL+ starts using intel_compute_page_offset() (since

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/7] drm/i915: change intel_fill_fb_ggtt_view() to use the real tile size

2016-01-12 Thread ville . syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Use the actual tile size as to compute stuff in intel_fill_fb_ggtt_view() instead of assuming it's PAGE_SIZE. I suppose it doesn't matter since we don't use the results on gen2 platforms where the tile size is 2k. v2: Update due to CbCr plane Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä Re

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 6/7] drm/i915: s/intel_gen4_compute_page_offset/intel_compute_tile_offset/

2016-01-12 Thread ville . syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Since intel_gen4_compute_page_offset() can now handle tiling formats all the way down to gen2, rename it to intel_compute_tile_offset(). Not that we actually use it on gen2/3 since there's no DSPSURF etc. registers which would take a page aligned address. v2: s/page/tile/ (Da

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/7] drm/i915: Redo intel_tile_height() as intel_tile_size() / intel_tile_width()

2016-01-12 Thread ville . syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä I find more usual to think about tile widths than heights, so changing the intel_tile_height() to calculate the tile height as tile_size/tile_width is easier than the opposite to the poor brain. v2: Reorder arguments for consistency Constify dev_priv arguments Signed-off

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 053/190] drm/i915: Convert i915_semaphores_is_enabled over to early sanitize

2016-01-12 Thread Dave Gordon
On 11/01/16 09:17, Chris Wilson wrote: Rather than recomputing whether semaphores are enabled, we can do that computation once during early initialisation as the i915.semaphores module parameter is now read-only. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 2 +-

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Extract vfunc setup from logical ring initializers

2016-01-12 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 05:32:34PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > From: Tvrtko Ursulin > > Majority of them was duplicated code and only render ring > currently overrides some of them. We can save some lines of > code and also take away the confusion on why bsd2 did not > do the seqno coherency w

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 10/38] drm/i915: Force MMIO flips when scheduler enabled

2016-01-12 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 03:07:03PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:19:26AM +, John Harrison wrote: > > On 11/01/2016 22:16, Chris Wilson wrote: > > >On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 06:42:39PM +, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote: > > >>From: John Harrison > > >> > > >>MMIO f

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Fix a memory leak where guc->execbuf_client is not freed

2016-01-12 Thread Yu Dai
On 01/12/2016 04:11 AM, Dave Gordon wrote: On 06/01/16 20:53, yu@intel.com wrote: > From: Alex Dai > > During driver unloading, the guc_client created for command submission > needs to be released to avoid memory leak. > > Signed-off-by: Alex Dai > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_su

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915/guc: Fix a memory leak where guc->execbuf_client is not freed

2016-01-12 Thread yu . dai
From: Alex Dai During driver unloading, the guc_client created for command submission needs to be released to avoid memory leak. The struct_mutex needs to be held before tearing down GuC. v1: Move i915_guc_submission_disable out of i915_guc_submission_fini and take struct_mutex lock before

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Allow i915_gem_object_get_page() on userptr as well

2016-01-12 Thread Chris Wilson
commit 033908aed5a596f6202c848c6bbc8a40fb1a8490 Author: Dave Gordon Date: Thu Dec 10 18:51:23 2015 + drm/i915: mark GEM object pages dirty when mapped & written by the CPU introduced a check into i915_gem_object_get_dirty_pages() that returned a NULL pointer when called with a bad obje

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Allow i915_gem_object_get_page() on userptr as well

2016-01-12 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:40:06PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > struct drm_i915_gem_object_ops { > + const unsigned int flags; Bleh, const is redundant as the definitions should be const themselves. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 4/7] drm/i915: Cache LRC state page in the context

2016-01-12 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 04:45:02PM +, Dave Gordon wrote: > On 12/01/16 13:11, Chris Wilson wrote: > >On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:54:25PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > >> > >>On 12/01/16 12:12, Chris Wilson wrote: > >>>On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:56:11AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > From: T

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4] drm/i915: edp resume/On time optimization.

2016-01-12 Thread abhay . kumar
From: Abhay Kumar Make resume/on codepath not to wait for panel_power_cycle_delay(t11_t12) if this time is already spent in suspend/poweron time. v2: Use CLOCK_BOOTTIME and remove jiffies for panel power cycle delay calculation(Ville). v3: Addressed below comments 1. Tracking time from

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 00/38] GPU scheduler for i915 driver

2016-01-12 Thread Tian, Kevin
> From: Gordon, David S > Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 9:49 PM > > On 12/01/2016 11:43, John Harrison wrote: > > On 12/01/2016 04:37, Tian, Kevin wrote: > >>> From: john.c.harri...@intel.com > >>> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 2:42 AM > >>> > >>> From: John Harrison > >>> > >>> Implemented a

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] LPSS PWM support for devices that support it

2016-01-12 Thread C. B.
On 12 January 2016 at 08:59, Shobhit Kumar wrote: > Not sending yet to pwm mailing list as this is all untested. C.B. please > test the patches and see if they work at all for you. For testing Please > enable - > > CONFIG_PWM_LPSS=y > CONFIG_PWM_LPSS_PLATFORM=y I applied these patches to 4.4-rc8

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] LPSS PWM support for devices that support it

2016-01-12 Thread Kumar, Shobhit
On 01/13/2016 11:00 AM, C. B. wrote: On 12 January 2016 at 08:59, Shobhit Kumar wrote: Not sending yet to pwm mailing list as this is all untested. C.B. please test the patches and see if they work at all for you. For testing Please enable - CONFIG_PWM_LPSS=y CONFIG_PWM_LPSS_PLATFORM=y I ap

[Intel-gfx] ✗ warning: Fi.CI.BAT

2016-01-12 Thread Patchwork
== Summary == Built on 06d0112e293dfdea7f796d4085f755898850947b drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-01m-12d-21h-16m-40s UTC integration manifest Test gem_storedw_loop: Subgroup basic-render: pass -> DMESG-WARN (bdw-nuci7) dmesg-warn -> PASS (bdw-ultra) Te

<    1   2