[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt: Save/Restore Backlight registers when PG0 is gated

2015-12-31 Thread Vidya Srinivas
Currently Backlight registers which are associated with Power Well 0 are not being saved before gating the power well for S0ix. Hence, upon resume from S0ix, these registers are not being restored. Due to this, the display has resumed and since there is no backlight, nothing is seen. Patch fixes th

[Intel-gfx] ✗ warning: Fi.CI.BAT

2015-12-31 Thread Patchwork
== Summary == Built on 79686f613b3955a4ed09cee936e7f70ec4e61b67 drm-intel-nightly: 2015y-12m-30d-11h-59m-54s UTC integration manifest Test kms_flip: Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms: dmesg-warn -> PASS (ilk-hp8440p) Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Hold a RPM reference during i915_driver_unload

2015-12-31 Thread Gabriel Feceoru
On 30.12.2015 15:03, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: Hi, On ti, 2015-12-29 at 12:55 +0200, Gabriel Feceoru wrote: This fixes an issue added with: "1f814da drm/i915: add support for checking if we hold an RPM reference", noticed while running drv_module_reload_basic. WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2032 at drive

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Hold a RPM reference during i915_driver_unload

2015-12-31 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
On to, 2015-12-31 at 12:44 +0200, Gabriel Feceoru wrote: > > On 30.12.2015 15:03, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > Hi > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c > > > @@ -1136,6 +1136,8 @@ int i915_driver_unload(struct drm_device > > > *dev) > > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->d

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Add RPM references in the *_get_hw_state functions

2015-12-31 Thread Gabriel Feceoru
This gets rid of errors like: [ 906.286213] [ cut here ] [ 906.286233] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 12252 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h:1457 gen6_read32+0x1ca/0x1e0 [i915]() [ 906.286234] RPM wakelock ref not held during HW access [ 906.286235] Modules linked in: [ 906.

[Intel-gfx] ✗ failure: Fi.CI.BAT

2015-12-31 Thread Patchwork
== Summary == Built on 79686f613b3955a4ed09cee936e7f70ec4e61b67 drm-intel-nightly: 2015y-12m-30d-11h-59m-54s UTC integration manifest Test gem_basic: Subgroup create-close: pass -> DMESG-WARN (skl-i7k-2) Test gem_cpu_reloc: Subgroup basic: pa

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Add RPM references in the *_get_hw_state functions

2015-12-31 Thread Gabriel Feceoru
This gets rid of errors like: [ 906.286213] [ cut here ] [ 906.286233] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 12252 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h:1457 gen6_read32+0x1ca/0x1e0 [i915]() [ 906.286234] RPM wakelock ref not held during HW access [ 906.286235] Modules linked in: [ 906.

[Intel-gfx] ✗ warning: Fi.CI.BAT

2015-12-31 Thread Patchwork
== Summary == Built on 79686f613b3955a4ed09cee936e7f70ec4e61b67 drm-intel-nightly: 2015y-12m-30d-11h-59m-54s UTC integration manifest Test kms_flip: Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms: dmesg-warn -> PASS (ilk-hp8440p) Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt: Fix eDP panel power save/restore

2015-12-31 Thread Matt Roper
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 08:31:45AM +0530, Kannan, Vandana wrote: > When I submitted the PPS patch in April, I got an input from Jani to > not make changes in i915_suspend.c as it was to become obsolete. > Below mail for your reference. > > Jani, > Does your initial comment still hold good? I don'

Re: [Intel-gfx] Why idle_freq is set to RPn and not RPe

2015-12-31 Thread Kamble, Sagar A
On 12/30/2015 4:20 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 04:09:46PM +0530, Kamble, Sagar A wrote: Turbo frequency range is Rpe to Rp0 when GPU is active as, on workload submission frequency is taken to Rpe. Does the HW require us to drop to RPn before entering RC6? I