Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Announce support for framebuffer modifiers

2015-02-08 Thread He, Shuang
Hello, this one is invalid report when debugging smarter patch apply method, in which case, baseline has id bigger than this task will generate invalidate comparison result. I have fixed the comparison algorithm. A correct one will be sent out later Thanks --Shuang > -Original Messa

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Announce support for framebuffer modifiers

2015-02-08 Thread shuang . he
Tested-By: PRC QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang...@intel.com) Task id: 5721 -Summary- Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied PNV 283/283

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Do not invalidate obj->pages under mempressure

2015-02-08 Thread Sean V Kelley
On 01/16/2015 08:05 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:44:00PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:36:15PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Chris Wilson >>> wrote: This (partially) reverts commit 5537252b6b6d

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/skl: Restructured the gen6_set_rps_thresholds function

2015-02-08 Thread Akash Goel
On Fri, 2015-02-06 at 15:48 +, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 08:26:34PM +0530, akash.g...@intel.com wrote: > > From: Akash Goel > > > > Prior to SKL, the time period programmed in Up/Down EI & Up/Down > > threshold registers was in units of 1.28 micro seconds. But for > > SKL,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915/skl: Updated the gen6_rps_limits function

2015-02-08 Thread Akash Goel
On Fri, 2015-02-06 at 15:43 +, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 08:26:35PM +0530, akash.g...@intel.com wrote: > > From: Akash Goel > > > > RP Interrupt Up/Down Frequency Limits register (A014) definition > > has changed for SKL. Updated the gen6_rps_limits function as per that >