Re: [Intel-gfx] [drm/i915/3.17] panic in i915_digport_work_func

2014-09-01 Thread Dave Airlie
> drm/i915: add DP 1.2 MST support (v0.7) > > This adds DP 1.2 MST support on Haswell systems. > I've attached a patch that might fix this, please test and let me know. Dave. From d407c946fbf5c48f30160591f5bd71fbe158aeb4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dave Airlie Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 16:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [drm/i915/3.17] panic in i915_digport_work_func

2014-09-01 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 17:02 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > drm/i915: add DP 1.2 MST support (v0.7) > > > > This adds DP 1.2 MST support on Haswell systems. > > > I've attached a patch that might fix this, please test and let me know. Lappy hasn't exploded in 20 boot cycles, which judging b

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix lock dropping in intel_tv_detect()

2014-09-01 Thread ville . syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä When intel_tv_detect() fails to do load detection it would forget to drop the locks and clean up the acquire context. Fix it up. This is a regression from: commit 208bf9fdcd3575aa4a5d48b3e0295f7cdaf6fc44 Author: Ville Syrjälä Date: Mon Aug 11 13:15:35 2014 +0300 dr

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Improved w/a for rps on Baytrail

2014-09-01 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 08:31:21PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Rewrite commit 31685c258e0b0ad6aa486c5ec001382cf8a64212 > Author: Deepak S > Date: Thu Jul 3 17:33:01 2014 -0400 > > drm/i915/vlv: WA for Turbo and RC6 to work together. > > Other than code clarity, the major improvement is to

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Fix to Enable GT/PM Interrupts for cherryview.

2014-09-01 Thread Deepak S
On Thursday 28 August 2014 11:00 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 08:45:21AM +0530, Deepak S wrote: On Tuesday 26 August 2014 07:24 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 08:32:40AM +0530, deepa...@linux.intel.com wrote: From: Deepak S Programing GT IER interrupts

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Improved w/a for rps on Baytrail

2014-09-01 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 11:23:20AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 08:31:21PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Rewrite commit 31685c258e0b0ad6aa486c5ec001382cf8a64212 > > Author: Deepak S > > Date: Thu Jul 3 17:33:01 2014 -0400 > > > > drm/i915/vlv: WA for Turbo and RC6

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915: Init important ns2501 registers

2014-09-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 01:22:03AM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > In my earlier rewrite I missed a few important registers. Thomas Richter > noticed that they're needed to make his machine resume correctly. > > Looks like IEGD does a one time init of these

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915: Fix DVO 2x clock enable on 830M

2014-09-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 01:22:05AM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > The spec says: > "For the correct operation of the muxed DVO pins (GDEVSELB/ I2Cdata, > GIRDBY/I2CClk) and (GFRAMEB/DVI_Data, GTRDYB/DVI_Clk): Bit 31 > (DPLL VCO Enable) and Bit 30 (2X Clock E

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2014-09-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi Dave, drm-intel-next-2014-08-22: - basic code for execlist, which is the fancy new cmd submission on gen8. Still disabled by default (Ben, Oscar Mateo, Thomas Daniel et al) - remove the useless usage of console_lock for I915_FBDEV=n (Chris) - clean up relations between ctx and ppgtt - clean u

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix lock dropping in intel_tv_detect()

2014-09-01 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 11:09:46AM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > When intel_tv_detect() fails to do load detection it would forget to > drop the locks and clean up the acquire context. Fix it up. > > This is a regression from: > commit 208bf9fdcd3575aa4a5

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/16] drm/i915: 830M/ns201 fixes again

2014-09-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:57:21AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 01:21:52AM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > Thomas asked me to repost my 830/ns2501 patches. So here they are. I added > > a few more patches (trickle feed and unuse

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] A few fixes on top of the wa_regs patches

2014-09-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 08:32:55PM +0100, Siluvery, Arun wrote: > On 30/08/2014 16:50, Damien Lespiau wrote: > >Hi Arun, > > > >I've compiled a few patches that I think solve some small-ish issues around > >your wa_regs series. Could you please have a look at them and comment/give > >your > >r-b t

Re: [Intel-gfx] [drm/i915/3.17] panic in i915_digport_work_func

2014-09-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 05:02:51PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > drm/i915: add DP 1.2 MST support (v0.7) > > > > This adds DP 1.2 MST support on Haswell systems. > > > I've attached a patch that might fix this, please test and let me know. > > Dave. > From d407c946fbf5c48f30160591f5bd71fb

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] A few fixes on top of the wa_regs patches

2014-09-01 Thread Siluvery, Arun
On 01/09/2014 10:08, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 08:32:55PM +0100, Siluvery, Arun wrote: On 30/08/2014 16:50, Damien Lespiau wrote: Hi Arun, I've compiled a few patches that I think solve some small-ish issues around your wa_regs series. Could you please have a look at them an

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix lock dropping in intel_tv_detect()

2014-09-01 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:50:22AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 11:09:46AM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > When intel_tv_detect() fails to do load detection it would forget to > > drop the locks and clean up the acquire context.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix lock dropping in intel_tv_detect()

2014-09-01 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 12:45:56PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:50:22AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c > > index 32186a6..a109b7b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c > > +++

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Fix lock dropping in intel_tv_detect()

2014-09-01 Thread ville . syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä When intel_tv_detect() fails to do load detection it would forget to drop the locks and clean up the acquire context. Fix it up. This is a regression from: commit 208bf9fdcd3575aa4a5d48b3e0295f7cdaf6fc44 Author: Ville Syrjälä Date: Mon Aug 11 13:15:35 2014 +0300 dr

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Fix lock dropping in intel_tv_detect()

2014-09-01 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 01:07:40PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > When intel_tv_detect() fails to do load detection it would forget to > drop the locks and clean up the acquire context. Fix it up. > > This is a regression from: > commit 208bf9fdcd3575aa4a5

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Fix lock dropping in intel_tv_detect()

2014-09-01 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 11:20:09AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 01:07:40PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > When intel_tv_detect() fails to do load detection it would forget to > > drop the locks and clean up the acquire context.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Fix lock dropping in intel_tv_detect()

2014-09-01 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 01:36:37PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 11:20:09AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 01:07:40PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com > > wrote: > > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > > > When intel_tv_detect() fails to do load dete

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Rename intel_wa_registers with a i915_ prefix

2014-09-01 Thread Siluvery, Arun
On 30/08/2014 16:50, Damien Lespiau wrote: Those debugfs files are prefixed by i915, the name of the kernel module, presumably to make the difference with files exposed by core DRM. Also, add a ',' at the end of the last entry. This is to ease the conflict resolution when rebasing internal patch

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: i915: reduce memory footprint when debugging

2014-09-01 Thread Andy Shevchenko
There is no need to use hex_dump_to_buffer() since we have a kernel helper to dump up to 64 bytes just via printk(). In our case the actual size is 15 bytes. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 6 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915: Track which port is using which pipe's power sequencer

2014-09-01 Thread Antti Koskipää
Reviewed-by: Antti Koskipaa -- - Antti On 08/18/2014 10:16 PM, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > VLV/CHV have a per-pipe panel power sequencer which locks onto the > port once used. We need to keep track wich power sequencers are > locked to which ports. > > Sign

[Intel-gfx] DRI3 only DDX driver

2014-09-01 Thread Steven Newbury
I tried building the xorg intel ddx driver with only DRI3 support, with DRI1 and DRI2 disabled. glxinfo says direct rendering is enabled, but gives no core contexts*. gnome-shell appears to be using software fallback, generally there seems to be no hardware acceleration. I'm wondering if DRI3

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Don't restrict i915_wa_registers to BDW

2014-09-01 Thread Siluvery, Arun
On 30/08/2014 16:51, Damien Lespiau wrote: We have CHV code that already makes the test obsolete. Besides, when num_wa_regs is 0 (platforms not gathering that W/A data), we expose something sensible already. Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 5 - 1 f

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Cache EDID for a detection cycle

2014-09-01 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 09:36:03AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > As we may query the edid multiple times following a detect, record the > EDID found during output discovery and reuse it. This is a separate > issue from caching the output EDID across detection cycles. My only real concern here is wh

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Cache EDID for a detection cycle

2014-09-01 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 03:05:26PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 09:36:03AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > As we may query the edid multiple times following a detect, record the > > EDID found during output discovery and reuse it. This is a separate > > issue from caching th

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: i915: reduce memory footprint when debugging

2014-09-01 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 01 Sep 2014, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > There is no need to use hex_dump_to_buffer() since we have a kernel helper to > dump up to 64 bytes just via printk(). In our case the actual size is 15 > bytes. Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i9

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/edid: Reduce horizontal timings for pixel replicated modes

2014-09-01 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:11:07AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:10:09AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 02:21:21PM -0700, clinton.a.tay...@intel.com wrote: > > > From: Clint Taylor > > > > > > Pixel replicated modes should be 720 horizontal pixe

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/edid: Reduce horizontal timings for pixel replicated modes

2014-09-01 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 04:12:27PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:11:07AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:10:09AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 02:21:21PM -0700, clinton.a.tay...@intel.com > > > wrote: > > > > From: C

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/edid: Reduce horizontal timings for pixel replicated modes

2014-09-01 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 02:21:21PM -0700, clinton.a.tay...@intel.com wrote: > From: Clint Taylor > > Pixel replicated modes should be 720 horizontal pixel and pixel > replicated by the HW across the HDMI cable at 2X pixel clock. Current > horizontal resolution of 1440 does not allow pixel duplica

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Prevent recursive deadlock on releasing a busy userptr

2014-09-01 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 08/07/2014 02:20 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: During release of the GEM object we hold the struct_mutex. As the object may be holding onto the last reference for the task->mm, calling mmput() may trigger exit_mmap() which close the vma which will call drm_gem_vm_close() and attempt to reacquire th

Re: [Intel-gfx] [drm/i915/3.17] panic in i915_digport_work_func

2014-09-01 Thread Imre Deak
On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 17:02 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > From: Dave Airlie > Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 16:58:12 +1000 > Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: handle G45/GM45 pulse detection connected > state. > > In the HPD pulse handler we check for long pulses if the port is > actually > connected, however we

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] Rework workaround init fn for BDW and CHV

2014-09-01 Thread Arun Siluvery
The patches that initialize workarounds for BDW and CHV using LRIs are already merged in the tree but I received few more comments from Chris and Damien. I have reworked these patches as per their comments; it fixes some issues and the code now looks clean. we can easily add more workarounds with

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Rework workaround init functions for BDW and CHV

2014-09-01 Thread Arun Siluvery
This rework is based on suggestion from Chris. Now w/a are organized in an array and all of them are emitted in single fn instead of sending them individually. This approach is very clean and new w/a can be added with minimal changes. The same array can be used when exporting them to debugfs and th

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Rework workaround data exporting to debugfs

2014-09-01 Thread Arun Siluvery
Now w/a are organized in an array so we know exactly how many of them are applied; use the same array while exporting data to debugfs and remove the temporary array we currently have in driver priv structure. Signed-off-by: Arun Siluvery --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 41 +

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Don't restrict i915_wa_registers to BDW

2014-09-01 Thread Arun Siluvery
From: Damien Lespiau We have CHV code that already makes the test obsolete. Besides, when num_wa_regs is 0 (platforms not gathering that W/A data), we expose something sensible already. Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau Reviewed-by: Arun Siluvery --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 5 -

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Rename intel_wa_registers with a i915_ prefix

2014-09-01 Thread Arun Siluvery
From: Damien Lespiau Those debugfs files are prefixed by i915, the name of the kernel module, presumably to make the difference with files exposed by core DRM. Also, add a ',' at the end of the last entry. This is to ease the conflict resolution when rebasing internal patches that add a member a

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] Rework workaround igt

2014-09-01 Thread Arun Siluvery
Rework of the test as kernel patch is modified. Arun Siluvery (1): igt/gem_workarounds: rework igt to test workaround registers Damien Lespiau (1): gem_workarounds: intel_wa_registers is now prefixed with i915 tests/gem_workarounds.c | 46 -- 1 fi

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] igt/gem_workarounds: rework igt to test workaround registers

2014-09-01 Thread Arun Siluvery
kernel patch that exports w/a data to debugfs is reworked so update igt accordingly. Address review comments from Damien. - if kernel is not exposing w/a data instead of failing just skip instead. - if the platform is not exposing w/a table then no of workarounds applied are 0; we can use this dat

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] gem_workarounds: intel_wa_registers is now prefixed with i915

2014-09-01 Thread Arun Siluvery
From: Damien Lespiau Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau --- tests/gem_workarounds.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/gem_workarounds.c b/tests/gem_workarounds.c index 6826562..32156d2 100644 --- a/tests/gem_workarounds.c +++ b/tests/gem_workarounds.c @@ -184,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Rework workaround data exporting to debugfs

2014-09-01 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 02:28:53PM +0100, Arun Siluvery wrote: > Now w/a are organized in an array so we know exactly how many of them > are applied; use the same array while exporting data to debugfs and > remove the temporary array we currently have in driver priv structure. > > Signed-off-by: A

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: Include task->name and master status in debugfs clients info

2014-09-01 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > Showing who is the current master is useful for trying to decypher > errors when trying to acquire master (e.g. a race with X taking over > from plymouth). By including the process name as well as the pid > simplifies the task of grabbing e

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] igt/gem_workarounds: rework igt to test workaround registers

2014-09-01 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 02:29:47PM +0100, Arun Siluvery wrote: > kernel patch that exports w/a data to debugfs is reworked so > update igt accordingly. > > Address review comments from Damien. > - if kernel is not exposing w/a data instead of failing just skip instead. > - if the platform is not e

Re: [Intel-gfx] [drm/i915/3.17] panic in i915_digport_work_func

2014-09-01 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 01 Sep 2014, Imre Deak wrote: > On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 17:02 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: >> From: Dave Airlie >> Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 16:58:12 +1000 >> Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: handle G45/GM45 pulse detection connected >> state. >> >> In the HPD pulse handler we check for long pulses if

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: Include task->name and master status in debugfs clients info

2014-09-01 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 04:11:43PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: > Hi > > On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Showing who is the current master is useful for trying to decypher > > errors when trying to acquire master (e.g. a race with X taking over > > from plymouth). By inclu

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: Include task->name and master status in debugfs clients info

2014-09-01 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 04:11:43PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: >> Hi >> >> On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >> > Showing who is the current master is useful for trying to decypher >> > errors when trying to acquire

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Rework workaround data exporting to debugfs

2014-09-01 Thread Siluvery, Arun
On 01/09/2014 15:06, Damien Lespiau wrote: On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 02:28:53PM +0100, Arun Siluvery wrote: Now w/a are organized in an array so we know exactly how many of them are applied; use the same array while exporting data to debugfs and remove the temporary array we currently have in driv

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Rework workaround data exporting to debugfs

2014-09-01 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 03:45:29PM +0100, Siluvery, Arun wrote: > >>+ /* > >>+* Most of workarounds are masked registers; > >>+* to set a bit in lower 16-bits we set a mask bit in > >>+* upper 16-bits so we can take either of them as mask but > >>+

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't call intel_plane_restore() when the prop value didn't change

2014-09-01 Thread ville . syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä No point in calling intel_plane_restore() in .set_property() if the value didn't change. More importantly this papers over a bug where the current primary plane code forgets to update the user coordinates we store under intel_plane unless the primary plane .update_plane() hoo

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't call intel_plane_restore() when the prop value didn't change

2014-09-01 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 06:08:25PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > No point in calling intel_plane_restore() in .set_property() if the > value didn't change. > > More importantly this papers over a bug where the current primary plane > code forgets to update

[Intel-gfx] Regression in drm-intel caused by d91a2cb8e510

2014-09-01 Thread Alan Stern
Daniel: I'm encountering a problem with the drm-intel-nightly branch in your drm-intel repository. The symptom is that when I boot my laptop, at some point during the start-up procedure the screen goes totally blank, as though the backlight were turned off, and it remains that way. I can't tell

Re: [Intel-gfx] Regression in drm-intel caused by d91a2cb8e510

2014-09-01 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 04:19:23PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > Daniel: > > I'm encountering a problem with the drm-intel-nightly branch in your > drm-intel repository. The symptom is that when I boot my laptop, at > some point during the start-up procedure the screen goes totally blank, > as thoug

Re: [Intel-gfx] Regression in drm-intel caused by d91a2cb8e510

2014-09-01 Thread Alan Stern
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Damien Lespiau wrote: > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 04:19:23PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > Daniel: > > > > I'm encountering a problem with the drm-intel-nightly branch in your > > drm-intel repository. The symptom is that when I boot my laptop, at > > some point during the start