Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: simplify pipe checking

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 21:28, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 03:01:12AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> Eugeni Dodonov (07/01/2012): >> > This is also handled by i915_reg.h, so just reuse this trick to reduce >> > universe enthropy. >> >> entropy. >> >> Besides that: >> >> Revie

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Check that plane/pipe is disabled before removing the fb

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:01:13PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > Staring at an error state such as: > > PGTBL_ER: 0x0400 > Display B: Invalid tiling > fence[0] = 05001001 > valid, x-tiled, pitch: 512, start: 0x0500, size: 1048576 > Pinned [2]: > 131072 0001 0001 000

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] [RFC] drm/i915: read-read semaphore optimization

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 02:20:55PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On 01/16/2012 01:50 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:36:15AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > >> On 12/13/2011 09:22 AM, Eric Anholt wrote: > >>> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:52:08 -0800, Ben Widawsky > >>> wrote: >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: set AUD_CONFIG N_value_index for DisplayPort

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 07:08:09AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:44:43PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:26:18 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > > Keith, does this address your concern and this patch is r-b: Keith or do > > > we want an > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4] drivers: i915: Default backlight PWM frequency

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:47:58PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:12:58 -0800, > Simon Que wrote: > > > > If the firmware did not initialize the backlight PWM registers, set up a > > default PWM frequency of 200 Hz. This is determined using the following > > formula: > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drivers: i915: Fix BLC PWM register setup

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 05:50:26PM -0800, Simon Que wrote: > There is an error in i915_read_blc_pwm_ctl, where the register values > are not being copied correctly. BLC_PWM_CTL and BLC_PWM_CTL2 are > getting mixed up. This patch fixes that so that saveBLC_PWM_CTL2 and > not saveBLC_PWM_CTL is cop

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Force synchronous TLB invalidations on the BLT ring for SNB+

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 12:17:06PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:15:06 +, Chris Wilson > wrote: > > On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 10:57:00 -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: > > > On Wed, 9 Nov 2011 17:32:26 +, Chris Wilson > > > wrote: > > > > We are advised that in order to workar

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915:: Disable FBC on SandyBridge

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 11:17:34PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > Enabling FBC is causing the BLT ring to run between 10-100x slower than > normal and frequently lockup. The interim solution is disable FBC once > more until we know why. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Iirc fbc isn't really worth i

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: kill i915_mem.c

2012-01-17 Thread Dave Airlie
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 21:56 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:23:14PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> > Some decent history digging indicates that this was to be used for the >> > GLX_MESA_allocate_memory extension

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Mask the ring->head offset using the ring->size

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 11:13:12PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > Rather than relying on the hardware to do this correctly, we can > trivially do it ourselves. > > This fixes a very reliable crash on d-i-n with all bits enabled during a > cairo-trace replay. The symptoms of the crash is that we cont

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] [RFC] drm/i915: Warning when reads or writes are dropped

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 05:03:54PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > The GTFIFODBG register gives us 3 error types when the fifo is accessed > and full. Whenever we do a forcewake_put we can check this register to > see if any of the CPU related errors occurred. > > Of more interest is perhaps the bit

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Mask the ring->head offset using the ring->size

2012-01-17 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:59:27 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 11:13:12PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Rather than relying on the hardware to do this correctly, we can > > trivially do it ourselves. > > > > This fixes a very reliable crash on d-i-n with all bits enabled duri

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Fix recursive calls to unmap

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 03:23:39PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 20:19:23 + > Dave Airlie wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > The solution here is to add a new flag to the call chain which gives > > >> > the > > >> > routines the information they need to possibly defer actions which

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915:: Disable FBC on SandyBridge

2012-01-17 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:57:05 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 11:17:34PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Enabling FBC is causing the BLT ring to run between 10-100x slower than > > normal and frequently lockup. The interim solution is disable FBC once > > more until we know why

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Enable FBC on IVB architecture.

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 03:15:09PM -0200, Eugeni Dodonov wrote: > This is mostly similar to Ironlake, with some register changes and > additional tricks. > > Jesse mentioned that it would make more sense to move those bits into > ivb-specific functions instead of making this work within ironlake o

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] [RFC] drm/i915: Warning when reads or writes are dropped

2012-01-17 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:08:57 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 05:03:54PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > The GTFIFODBG register gives us 3 error types when the fifo is accessed > > and full. Whenever we do a forcewake_put we can check this register to > > see if any of the CPU

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: kill i915_mem.c

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
Some decent history digging indicates that this was to be used for the GLX_MESA_allocate_memory extension but never actually implemented for any released i915 userspace code. So just rip it out. v2: Fixup the Makefile. Acked-by: Dave Airlie Cc: Keith Whitwell Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter ---

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] Minor cleanup series

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 02:38:41PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > Just a few things spotted in a readthrough. The DPLL disable one might > actually be a bugfix, who knows. I've queued patches 1,2&5 for -next. 3 is already fixed and 4 won't be true in the near future due to something I'm not yet all

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Force synchronous TLB invalidations on the BLT ring for SNB+

2012-01-17 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:49:53 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > What's the status of this patch? If you resend can you clarify the > bugzilla reference and also include a Bspec/PRM/whatever citation for > this workaround? We don't know what it works around, nor do we have any idea if it affects any bu

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915:: Disable FBC on SandyBridge

2012-01-17 Thread Eugeni Dodonov
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 08:57, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 11:17:34PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Enabling FBC is causing the BLT ring to run between 10-100x slower than > > normal and frequently lockup. The interim solution is disable FBC once > > more until we know why. >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: kill i915_mem.c

2012-01-17 Thread Eugeni Dodonov
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 08:58, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Keith Whitwell > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 21:56 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:23:14PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> > Some decent history digging indicates that this

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915:: Disable FBC on SandyBridge

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:16, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:57:05 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 11:17:34PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: >> > Enabling FBC is causing the BLT ring to run between 10-100x slower than >> > normal and frequently lockup. The interi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/dp: Tweak auxch clock divider for PCH

2012-01-17 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:39:44 -0400 Adam Jackson wrote: > Matches the advice in the Sandybridge documentation. > > Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c |2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/dp: Tweak auxch clock divider for PCH

2012-01-17 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:39:44 -0400 Adam Jackson wrote: > Matches the advice in the Sandybridge documentation. > > Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c |2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/dp: Tweak auxch clock divider for PCH

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 07:19:35AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:39:44 -0400 > Adam Jackson wrote: > > > Matches the advice in the Sandybridge documentation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c |2 +- > > 1 files changed, 1

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm: Fill in more of the DisplayPort DPCD registers

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 03:42:11PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:37:59 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson > > > +# define DP_DWN_STRM_PORT_TYPE_TMDS(2 << 1) > > This could be labeled TYPE_DVI_OR_HDMI according to the DP 1.1a spec. > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] FBC patchset

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 08:43:47PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Oh dear, it was all looking too good. Works fine with just one output. > Runs into a nasty race if you add a second and start unplugging things... > > The issue is that when unplugging an output, userspace sees this and > appropriatel

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: add a LLC feature flag in device description

2012-01-17 Thread Eugeni Dodonov
LLC is not SNB/IVB-specific, so we should check for it in a more generic way. Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter Signed-off-by: Eugeni Dodonov --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c |1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c |3 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] intel: query for LLC support

2012-01-17 Thread Eugeni Dodonov
This adds support for querying the kernel about the LLC support in the hardware. In case the ioctl fails, we assume that it is present on GEN6 and GEN7. Signed-off-by: Eugeni Dodonov --- include/drm/i915_drm.h |1 + intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c | 12 2 files changed, 13 inserti

Re: [Intel-gfx] FBC patchset

2012-01-17 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:18:17 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > I've just noticed that we seem to miss this plug to fix fbc issues. Care > to resend a proper patch in case we still need this? > > Also, I we could try to also disable fbc when we detect frontbuffer > rendering (and generally abolish set

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] intel: query for LLC support

2012-01-17 Thread Eugeni Dodonov
This adds support for querying the kernel about the LLC support in the hardware. In case the ioctl fails, we assume that it is present on GEN6 and GEN7. Signed-off-by: Eugeni Dodonov --- include/drm/i915_drm.h |1 + intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c | 12 2 files changed, 13 inserti

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] intel: query for LLC support

2012-01-17 Thread Eugeni Dodonov
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 14:44, Eugeni Dodonov wrote: > This adds support for querying the kernel about the LLC support in the > hardware. > > In case the ioctl fails, we assume that it is present on GEN6 and GEN7. > > Signed-off-by: Eugeni Dodonov > Please ignore this and consider the next one

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Enable FBC on IVB architecture.

2012-01-17 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:22:44 +0100 Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 03:15:09PM -0200, Eugeni Dodonov wrote: > > This is mostly similar to Ironlake, with some register changes and > > additional tricks. > > > > Jesse mentioned that it would make more sense to move those bits into >

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: print out which pixel format we do not support

2012-01-17 Thread Eugeni Dodonov
Otherwise, we are left with pretty bogus message saying that the pixel format is not supported while leaving the details to the telepatic powers. Signed-off-by: Eugeni Dodonov --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/driv

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: print out which pixel format we do not support

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 03:11:11PM -0200, Eugeni Dodonov wrote: > Otherwise, we are left with pretty bogus message saying that the pixel > format is not supported while leaving the details to the telepatic powers. > > Signed-off-by: Eugeni Dodonov > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] intel: query for LLC support

2012-01-17 Thread Eugeni Dodonov
This adds support for querying the kernel about the LLC support in the hardware. In case the ioctl fails, we assume that it is present on GEN6 and GEN7. v2: fix the return code checking Signed-off-by: Eugeni Dodonov --- include/drm/i915_drm.h |1 + intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c | 12 +++

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: print out which pixel format we do not support

2012-01-17 Thread Eugeni Dodonov
Otherwise, we are left with pretty bogus message saying that the pixel format is not supported while leaving the details to the telepatic powers. v2: use DRM_DEBUG_KMS instead of DRM_ERROR Signed-off-by: Eugeni Dodonov --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 inse

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] intel: query for LLC support

2012-01-17 Thread Eric Anholt
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:58:21 -0200, Eugeni Dodonov wrote: > This adds support for querying the kernel about the LLC support in the > hardware. > > In case the ioctl fails, we assume that it is present on GEN6 and GEN7. This patch should probably come along with a consumer of the flag. pgpzbrb

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: add a LLC feature flag in device description

2012-01-17 Thread Eric Anholt
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:43:53 -0200, Eugeni Dodonov wrote: > LLC is not SNB/IVB-specific, so we should check for it in a more generic > way. > > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson > Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter > Signed-off-by: Eugeni Dodonov Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt pgpRyk23Qn3FJ.pgp Description: PG

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: kill i915_mem.c

2012-01-17 Thread Eric Anholt
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:50:12 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Some decent history digging indicates that this was to be used for the > GLX_MESA_allocate_memory extension but never actually implemented for > any released i915 userspace code. > > So just rip it out. > > v2: Fixup the Makefile. Revi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] [RFC] drm/i915: read-read semaphore optimization

2012-01-17 Thread Eric Anholt
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:15:31 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 02:20:55PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > On 01/16/2012 01:50 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:36:15AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > >> On 12/13/2011 09:22 AM, Eric Anholt wrote: > > >>> On

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: kill i915_mem.c

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 09:35:48AM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:50:12 +0100, Daniel Vetter > wrote: > > Some decent history digging indicates that this was to be used for the > > GLX_MESA_allocate_memory extension but never actually implemented for > > any released i915 user

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] sna: check for LLC support

2012-01-17 Thread Eugeni Dodonov
Instead of checking for CPU generation, use the libdrm-provided I915_PARAM_HAS_LLC instead. Signed-off-by: Eugeni Dodonov --- src/sna/kgem.c |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/sna/kgem.c b/src/sna/kgem.c index 970e462..96c5ddd 100644 --- a/src/sna/kge

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] configure: check for libdrm >= 2.4.31

2012-01-17 Thread Eugeni Dodonov
This is requried for I915_PARAM_HAS_LLC support. Signed-off-by: Eugeni Dodonov --- configure.ac |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 63beb64..604ea6d 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ required_pi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: add a LLC feature flag in device description

2012-01-17 Thread Kenneth Graunke
On 01/17/2012 08:43 AM, Eugeni Dodonov wrote: LLC is not SNB/IVB-specific, so we should check for it in a more generic way. Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter Signed-off-by: Eugeni Dodonov Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke ___ Intel-gf

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] sna: check for LLC support

2012-01-17 Thread Eugeni Dodonov
Instead of checking for CPU generation, use the libdrm-provided I915_PARAM_HAS_LLC instead. v2: use a define check to verify if we have I915_PARAM_HAS_LLC. Signed-off-by: Eugeni Dodonov --- src/sna/kgem.c | 12 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/s

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] sna: check for LLC support

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 04:16:37PM -0200, Eugeni Dodonov wrote: > Instead of checking for CPU generation, use the libdrm-provided > I915_PARAM_HAS_LLC instead. > > v2: use a define check to verify if we have I915_PARAM_HAS_LLC. > > Signed-off-by: Eugeni Dodonov > --- > src/sna/kgem.c | 12 +++

Re: [Intel-gfx] Problem Intel i915 driver, i3 2010T, HDMI output modes problems

2012-01-17 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Paulo, sorry for not getting back you sooner... your email was here on my "to do list" Could you please report this issue on bugs.freedesktop.org attaching this xrandr verbose info and also dmesg xorg log and confs? Also, Is it possible to test it without the AV receiver? I think you wont see

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] sna: check for LLC support

2012-01-17 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:16:37 -0200, Eugeni Dodonov wrote: > Instead of checking for CPU generation, use the libdrm-provided > I915_PARAM_HAS_LLC instead. > > v2: use a define check to verify if we have I915_PARAM_HAS_LLC. > > Signed-off-by: Eugeni Dodonov I attacked it slightly so that gem_pa

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: add a LLC feature flag in device description

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 02:43:53PM -0200, Eugeni Dodonov wrote: > LLC is not SNB/IVB-specific, so we should check for it in a more generic > way. > > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson > Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter > Signed-off-by: Eugeni Dodonov Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. -Daniel -- Daniel

Re: [Intel-gfx] Sandy Bridge Desktop - 1920x1080i interlace not working

2012-01-17 Thread Eugeni Dodonov
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 18:14, Alfonso Fiore wrote: > > Hi Angela, > > I have a very similar problem! > > I have Sandy Bridge (i3 2130) and a Philips 32pf9731d (coincidence?). With > my previous i3 550 I didn't have any problem. > > I tried all possible resolutions over HDMI and all the time the s

Re: [Intel-gfx] Sandy Bridge Desktop - 1920x1080i interlace not working

2012-01-17 Thread Alfonso Fiore
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Eugeni Dodonov wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 18:14, Alfonso Fiore wrote: > >> >> Hi Angela, >> >> I have a very similar problem! >> >> I have Sandy Bridge (i3 2130) and a Philips 32pf9731d (coincidence?). >> With my previous i3 550 I didn't have any problem. >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] Sandy Bridge Desktop - 1920x1080i interlace not working

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 09:59:18PM +0100, Alfonso Fiore wrote: > Hi, > > here is mine. Let me know if you need any other log. Ok, your TV only reports 1080i as a mode (at least that's the only thing your kernel can decode). The i915 driver then rejects it because it's interlaced (we unfortunately

Re: [Intel-gfx] Sandy Bridge Desktop - 1920x1080i interlace not working

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:32:33PM +0100, Angela Schmid wrote: > Hello > > Thanks for helping. I added the dmesg with drm.debug=0x0e below. > I tried last month with get-edid in DOS, with the same unhappy result, see > below for actual linux. > > >Could you try with the following two patches whi

Re: [Intel-gfx] Sandy Bridge Desktop - 1920x1080i interlace not working

2012-01-17 Thread Alfonso Fiore
> Ok, your TV only reports 1080i as a mode (at least that's the only thing your kernel can decode). true, it's non a Full HD TV. > we unfortunately do not yet support interlaced everywhere we could when do you think the support will be added? weeks? months? > can you add a short list of the

Re: [Intel-gfx] Sandy Bridge Desktop - 1920x1080i interlace not working

2012-01-17 Thread Angela Schmid
Hello Over HDMI works: "1280x720@50hz" 74.25 1280 1720 1760 1980 720 725 730 750 +hsync +vsync 1280x720@50hz (0xb4) 74.2MHz +HSync +VSync *current h: width 1280 start 1720 end 1760 total 1980 skew0 clock 37.5KHz v: height 720 start 725 end 730 total 750

Re: [Intel-gfx] Sandy Bridge Desktop - 1920x1080i interlace not working

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:53:47PM +0100, Angela Schmid wrote: > Over HDMI works: > > "1280x720@50hz" 74.25 1280 1720 1760 1980 720 725 730 750 +hsync +vsync > > 1280x720@50hz (0xb4) 74.2MHz +HSync +VSync *current > > h: width 1280 start 1720 end 1760 total 1980 skew0 clock

Re: [Intel-gfx] I've got the RC6 bug

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 01:16:02AM +0100, CC wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 05:18:17PM +0100, CC wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've heard that you need users having the RC6 bug. > > > > > > I have the following setup: > > > CPU: Intel C

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: rip out the HWSTAM missed irq workaround

2012-01-17 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 11:11:53PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > With the new ducttape of much finer quality, this seems to be no > longer necessary. > > Tested on my ivb and snb machine with the usual suspects of testcases. > > Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Make XAA support optional

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Stone
Does what it says on the box. Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone --- configure.ac | 14 ++ src/legacy/i810/Makefile.am |6 +- src/legacy/i810/i810.h|4 src/legacy/i810/i810_dga.c|2 ++ src/legacy/i810/i810_driver.c | 10 +- src

Re: [Intel-gfx] Sandy Bridge Desktop - 1920x1080i interlace not working

2012-01-17 Thread Angela Schmid
Hello Daniel >Your TV likely sends a CEA block with some HDMI default modes set. Since >linux-3.3-rc1 (to be released in a few days) we should be able to decode that. >Can you grab the latest -linus kernel git and try that? I wanted to remind, that the interlaced modes work with the noveau drive