Re: [Intel-gfx] 2.6.38-rc8 regressions

2011-03-16 Thread Jan Niehusmann
Hi Chris, On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 09:53:36AM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:08:12 +0100, Jan Niehusmann wrote: > > 1) Every now and then, terminal windows (urxvt) do not properly update > > their contents. After issueing a command like 'ls', which writes > > several lines of

Re: [Intel-gfx] 2.6.38-rc8 regressions

2011-03-16 Thread Chris Wilson
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:46:55 +0100, Jan Niehusmann wrote: > With that patch applied, I still observed the described behaviour. > Additionally, some java application had display update problems. (But > java generally has some problems because I'm using a non-reparenting > window manager, 'awesome',

Re: [Intel-gfx] 2.6.38-rc8 regressions

2011-03-16 Thread Jan Niehusmann
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 06:34:57PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:46:55 +0100, Jan Niehusmann wrote: > > With that patch applied, I still observed the described behaviour. > > Additionally, some java application had display update problems. (But > > java generally has some pro

[Intel-gfx] slow graphics after Suspend to RAM

2011-03-16 Thread John Harrigan
I have a Lenovo X201 laptop with an i7-620M processor. After I resume from a Suspend to RAM the graphics are very slow. Suspend to Disk does not cause the same problem and doing a Suspend to Disk after a Suspend to RAM fixes the problem. I see the same slow-down regardless of whether X11 is runn