Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] glx: Fix use after free in DrawableGone

2010-09-28 Thread Keith Packard
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:04:11 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote: > Signed-off-by: Kristian Høgsberg > --- > > Chris Wilson points out that we were still accessing c->next after free. > Here's an updated version that fixes that. I've merged this patch (and attempted to collect all of the *-by: line

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] CHROMIUM: i915: Added default LVDS options for the no-VBT case

2010-09-28 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:53:51 -0700, Simon Que wrote: > This function will be called before checking for VBT (ie for all > cases, as you suggested). Does that sound reasonable? Looks good so far. :) Both ways have their drawbacks, and it won't be until we have many more settings parsed from the V

[Intel-gfx] Time to wrap up -next

2010-09-28 Thread Chris Wilson
Just a reminder that I am in the process of checking through -next for any major outstanding issues before sending it off to Dave Airlie. If you have any code for 2.6.37 that you have not yet sent to the list, you are running out of time. Thanks, -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technol

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] CHROMIUM: i915: Added function to initialize VBT settings

2010-09-28 Thread Simon Que
Hi all, I have updated the patch containing the dither bit change and VBT default settings. This time, all default values have been moved to a single function, init_vbt_defaults. This function is called from intel_init_bios before checking for VBT. Hence, it is used in both the VBT found and VB

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] CHROMIUM: i915: Added function to initialize VBT settings

2010-09-28 Thread Simon Que
Hi all, I have updated the patch containing the dither bit change and VBT default settings. This time, all default values have been moved to a single function, init_vbt_defaults. This function is called from intel_init_bios before checking for VBT. Hence, it is used in both the VBT found and VB

Re: [Intel-gfx] Time to wrap up -next

2010-09-28 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2010.09.28 23:13:07 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Just a reminder that I am in the process of checking through -next for any > major outstanding issues before sending it off to Dave Airlie. If you have > any code for 2.6.37 that you have not yet sent to the list, you are > running out of time. >

[Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.12.902

2010-09-28 Thread Carl Worth
This is the second release candidate in preparation for the upcoming 2.13.0 release. This comes exactly one week after 2.12.902 and includes only a handful of changes. One significant change is that the driver now requires libdrm 2.4.22 (or newer), as several people reported compilation failures o