Re: [Intel-gfx] xf86-video-intel: configure.ac

2010-07-28 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:34:01 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > and glproto is missing a dep on GL: > > In file included from i810.h:60:0, > from i810_accel.c:41: > /usr/include/GL/glxint.h:36:19: fatal error: GL/gl.h: No such file or > directory >From memory, I think this is jus

Re: [Intel-gfx] xf86-video-intel: configure.ac

2010-07-28 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 4:42 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:34:01 -0700, Jesse Barnes > wrote: >> and glproto is missing a dep on GL: >> >> In file included from i810.h:60:0, >>                  from i810_accel.c:41: >> /usr/include/GL/glxint.h:36:19: fatal error: GL/gl.h: N

[Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-28 Thread Hanno Böck
Hi, it seems I'm currently getting insanely slow 3d performance on my system. q3demo benchmark (run with ` to start console, timedemo 1, demo demo001) gives me 57 fps. I think even my old r200 got more than 100 there. From the logs everything seems to be fine. Any ideas what I could look for w

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-28 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Hanno Böck wrote: > Hi, > > it seems I'm currently getting insanely slow 3d performance on my system. > q3demo benchmark (run with ` to start console, timedemo 1, demo demo001) gives > me 57 fps. I think even my old r200 got more than 100 there. > > From the logs e

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-28 Thread Hanno Böck
Am Mittwoch 28 Juli 2010 schrieb Matt Turner: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Hanno Böck wrote: > > Hi, > > > > it seems I'm currently getting insanely slow 3d performance on my system. > > q3demo benchmark (run with ` to start console, timedemo 1, demo demo001) > > gives me 57 fps. I think ev

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Enable panel fitting for eDP

2010-07-28 Thread Dave Airlie
did this patch go anywhere? On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > From: Zhao Yakui > > When trying to set other display mode besides the fixed panel mode, the > panel fitting should be enabled. This is similar to LVDS. > > Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Add fixed panel mode parsed from EDID for eDP without fixed mode in VBT

2010-07-28 Thread Dave Airlie
Or any of this series? I'm not seeing them upstream, and I'd really like to know if they are necessary. Dave. On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > From: Zhao Yakui > > Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson > Cc: sta...@kernel.org > --- >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Add fixed panel mode parsed from EDID for eDP without fixed mode in VBT

2010-07-28 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2010.07.29 11:00:03 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > Or any of this series? I'm not seeing them upstream, and I'd really > like to know if they are necessary. > It does like what for LVDS to set non panel fixed mode. I reviewed them too, or Chris might want to clean up fixed mode handling? -- Ope