On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 23:58 +0800, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 10:15 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> > On 2010.04.23 16:16:12 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > > Multifunction SDVO cards stopped working after 14571b4, and would report
> > > something that looked remarkably like an ADD2 SPD
On Wednesday May 5 2010 03:31:51 Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> If you use intel-drv shipped on distros, should have problems , do you
> use ubuntu ?
>
Intel-drv? Don't have such a package... I should have problems? :S
I'm happily running Archlinux
> I got a desktop with 945GM , don't have perf
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 15:59 +0200, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
> On Wednesday May 5 2010 03:31:51 Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> > If you use intel-drv shipped on distros, should have problems , do you
> > use ubuntu ?
> >
>
> Intel-drv? Don't have such a package... I should have problems? :S
xor
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:57:25 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Spatial dither is better than nothing, but ST is even better.
Hi Adam,
I'm going through the past couple weeks of traffic on the list looking
for patches that haven't gotten picked up yet.
So I'd love to review one like this, but it woul
Looks like you've forgotten to actually add intel_ringbuffer.c - it's
missing form the patch ;)
Please resend.
Cheers, Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Mail: dan...@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 22:28:22 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
> I've sent three patches to the list for review recently, and posed a
> question about possible buggy palette handling. Two of the patches I
> sent fix bugs (one "real", one a build issue), and there is a one
> clean-up.
>
> I've had no re
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 22:48:18 -0400, Matt Turner wrote:
> I've got a similar experience--I actually had two patches /accepted/
> and supposedly tucked away in a branch for merging after 2.11 was
> released. They've never been merged. I've pinged Carl at least twice,
> heard nothing back.
>
> Not s
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 10:52 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> I'm going through the past couple weeks of traffic on the list looking
> for patches that haven't gotten picked up yet.
>
> So I'd love to review one like this, but it would be easier if the
> commit message pointed me to something specific I
Dear All.
Sorry to disturb you again.
When I start glxgears on Fedora 13, it tells me that application and suppose to
be OpenGL, now synchronized to Vertical Refresh Rate (VRR), which in my case -
laptop LCD = 60. And it also tells me that FPS should be ~ the same. Good. No
problem with it.
Bu
introduce intel_ring_buffer structure.
sequential number, IRQ logic and hardware status page
were included in the intel_ring_buffer structure
Signed-off-by: Xiang Hai hao
Signed-off-by: Zou Nan hai
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile |1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |
convert ring buffer used by render engine to intel_ring_buffer
structure.
Signed-off-by: Xiang Hai hao
Signed-off-by: Zou Nan hai
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 14 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 159 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
add BSD ring buffer support on GM45+ systems.
BSD (bit-stream-decoder) engine is a GPU engine for H.264/VC1
VLD decoding.
Signed-off-by: Xiang Haihao
Signed-off-by: Zou Nanhai
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c |2 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |2 +
drivers/gpu/drm
remove single active_list amd request_list, seperate them into
every intel_ring_buffer structure.
use a flag in execbuffer2 to decide on which ring to run the
command
legacy ioctl are consider to run on render ring by default
Signed-off-by: Xiang Haihao
Signed-off-by: Zou Nanhai
---
drivers/gpu
On Wed, 5 May 2010 18:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
SD wrote:
> Dear All.
>
> Sorry to disturb you again.
> When I start glxgears on Fedora 13, it tells me that application and
> suppose to be OpenGL, now synchronized to Vertical Refresh Rate
> (VRR), which in my case - laptop LCD = 60. And it also tells me
I have resent the patches.
Please help review.
Thanks
Zou Nan hai
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:dan...@ffwll.ch]
Sent: 2010年5月6日 2:23
To: Zou, Nanhai
Cc: anh...@freedesktop.org; Anholt, Eric; Intel GFX
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] introduce intel_ring_buffer struc
--- On Thu, 5/6/10, SD wrote:
> From: SD
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] i915GM+vertical RR+FPS+OpenGL
> To: "Jesse Barnes"
> Date: Thursday, May 6, 2010, 6:38 AM
>
>
> --- On Thu, 5/6/10, Jesse Barnes
> wrote:
>
> > From: Jesse Barnes
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] i915GM+vertical
> RR+FPS+Ope
16 matches
Mail list logo
