Current code is definitely crap: Largest pitch allowed spills into
the TILING_Y bit of the fence registers ... :(
I've rewritten the limits check under the assumption that 3rd gen hw
has a 3d pitch limit of 8kb (like 2nd gen). This is supported by an
otherwise totally misleading XXX comment.
This
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:08:16 +0200, Daniel Vetter
wrote:
> Current code is definitely crap: Largest pitch allowed spills into
> the TILING_Y bit of the fence registers ... :(
>
> I've rewritten the limits check under the assumption that 3rd gen hw
> has a 3d pitch limit of 8kb (like 2nd gen). Th
pci.ids and the datasheet both say it's 358e, not 35e8.
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c |5 +++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |3 ++-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/
IS_MOBILE() catches 85x, so we'd always try to use the 9xx FIFO sizing;
since there's an explicit 85x version, this seems wrong.
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |7 ---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i91
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 23:02 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:57:51PM +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> > So any change this patch enter in fedora kernel ? or have this patch
> > against fedora kernels ?
>
> It's unlikely to end up in any current Fedora releases bec
Hi folks,
I discovered that windows wider than 2048 pixels contain only garbage
when using version 2.11.
I switched back to 2.9.1 and this doesn't happen. I use X server 1.7.6
from Debian Sid, kernel 2.6.33.2, libdrm 2.4.18 on a Mac mini Core 2
Duo with i945 graphics.
Regards,
Tino
_
'Twas brillig, and Tino Keitel at 15/04/10 21:18 did gyre and gimble:
> Hi folks,
>
> I discovered that windows wider than 2048 pixels contain only garbage
> when using version 2.11.
>
> I switched back to 2.9.1 and this doesn't happen. I use X server 1.7.6
> from Debian Sid, kernel 2.6.33.2, lib
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 02:03 +0800, Adam Jackson wrote:
> IS_MOBILE() catches 85x, so we'd always try to use the 9xx FIFO sizing;
> since there's an explicit 85x version, this seems wrong.
Right. It seems that the incorrect get_fifo_size callback function is
used for 85x.
It seems that the i830 is
