On 08/03/2025 at 01:07, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 07:11:42PM +0900, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
>> On 07/03/2025 at 02:55, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 01:08:15AM +0900, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
On 06/03/2025 at 22:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu,
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 07:11:42PM +0900, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
> On 07/03/2025 at 02:55, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 01:08:15AM +0900, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
> >> On 06/03/2025 at 22:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 08:29:58PM +0900, Vincent Mailhol
On 06/03/2025 at 22:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 08:29:58PM +0900, Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay wrote:
>> From: Vincent Mailhol
>>
>> Add some additional tests in lib/test_bits.c to cover the expected
>> results of the fixed type BIT_U*() macros.
>
> Still would be good to
On 07/03/2025 at 02:55, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 01:08:15AM +0900, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
>> On 06/03/2025 at 22:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 08:29:58PM +0900, Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
>>> wrote:
From: Vincent Mailhol
Add some a
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 01:08:15AM +0900, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
> On 06/03/2025 at 22:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 08:29:58PM +0900, Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
> > wrote:
> >> From: Vincent Mailhol
> >>
> >> Add some additional tests in lib/test_bits.c to cover the ex
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 08:29:58PM +0900, Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Vincent Mailhol
>
> Add some additional tests in lib/test_bits.c to cover the expected
> results of the fixed type BIT_U*() macros.
Still would be good to have a small assembly test case for GENMASK*() as they
