On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> BTW it would be a good idaa to include some kind of version number note
> on the whole series as well. Otherwise it could get a bit hard to find
> out which was the latest one. So the usual form is
> "[PATCH vN 00/MM] ..." or something like that.
Both g
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 04:07:10PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> This patch series rebases Ville's original cdclk patch series
> excluding the ones that have been reviewed.
>
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2014-November/055633.html
>
> The patches include modifications to
Hi,
I forgot to update authorships. I'll fix this and resend the patch
series.
Thanks for pointing this out!
-Mika-
On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 14:16 +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> Hi Mika,
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 04:07:10PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> > This patch series rebases Ville's origina
Hi Mika,
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 04:07:10PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> This patch series rebases Ville's original cdclk patch series
> excluding the ones that have been reviewed.
I believe you still have the authorship problem in that series. It'll be
great to have it fixed so Daniel doesn't pul
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 02:05:35PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> This patch series rebases Ville's original cdclk patch series
>
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2014-November/055633.html
>
> The patches include modifications to
For some reason, I haven't received all the patches
