On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 03:34:04PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Apr 2023, Maarten Lankhorst
> wrote:
> > Hi Dave, Daniel,
> > Pull request to avoid backmerges. ;)
> > Cheers,
> > ~Maarten
>
> Not using dim for this? Is the subject line copy-pasted from another
> pull request? :)
dim d
On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 11:18:06AM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Hi Dave & Daniel,
>
> Here goes the final drm-intel-gt-next pull request for v6.4.
>
> As top items we have a fix for context runtime accounting, Meteorlake
> enabling, DMAR error noise elimination due to GPU error capture, BAR
>
On Thu, 06 Apr 2023, Maarten Lankhorst
wrote:
> Hi Dave, Daniel,
> Pull request to avoid backmerges. ;)
> Cheers,
> ~Maarten
Not using dim for this? Is the subject line copy-pasted from another
pull request? :)
BR,
Jani.
>
> drm-misc-next-2023-04-06:
> drm-misc-next for v6.4-rc1:
>
> UAPI Chan
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 11:24:44AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> Hi Dave, Daniel,
>
> Here goes the first pull request for 6.3.
>
> What sticks out most is the amount of fixes, majority of which if not all
> would have already landed via gt/next fixes pull requests though, so I
> will only menti
On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 at 21:07, Joonas Lahtinen
wrote:
>
> Hi Dave & Daniel,
>
> Here goes first drm-intel-gt-next pull req towards 6.2.
>
> We have a fix for #6222 (kernel memory corruption issue) and fix for
> display regression after resume. A missing W/A for Gen12 iGPUs and
> extension of comput
On Wed, 2022-07-13 at 17:31 -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> Hi Dave and Daniel,
>
> On behalf of Tvrtko, who is recovering from Covid,
> here goes the latest drm-intel-gt-next pull request
> targeting 5.20.
Hi Folks,
any particular issue with this pull request?
We just realized it is not yet part
On Tue, 2022-02-22 at 11:44 -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 11:21:35AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Feb 2022, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > > On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 20:26, Joonas Lahtinen
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Dave & Daniel,
> > > >
> > > > Here is the fir
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 11:21:35AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 20:26, Joonas Lahtinen
wrote:
Hi Dave & Daniel,
Here is the first drm-intel-gt-next feature PR towards v5.18.
Am I missing some previous drm-intel pull?
/home/airli
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 20:26, Joonas Lahtinen
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dave & Daniel,
>>
>> Here is the first drm-intel-gt-next feature PR towards v5.18.
>
> Am I missing some previous drm-intel pull?
>
> /home/airlied/devel/kernel/dim/src/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/g
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 20:26, Joonas Lahtinen
wrote:
>
> Hi Dave & Daniel,
>
> Here is the first drm-intel-gt-next feature PR towards v5.18.
Am I missing some previous drm-intel pull?
/home/airlied/devel/kernel/dim/src/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c:
In function ‘rcs_engine_wa_init’
Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2021-08-06 13:06:17)
> Hi Dave & Daniel,
>
> Sorry for the big PR in advance. Had the summer vacations and did not
> notice until tool late how many patches were in already before leaving.
>
> As requested, there is a lot of refactoring to increase the use of TTM
> alloca
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 14:17, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 10:28, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> > This has these two patches applied, and it doesn't build.
> >
> > drm/i915: drop the __i915_active_call pointer packing
> > drm/i915: Fix crash in auto_retire
> >
> > The latter patch s
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 10:28, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> This has these two patches applied, and it doesn't build.
>
> drm/i915: drop the __i915_active_call pointer packing
> drm/i915: Fix crash in auto_retire
>
> The latter patch shouldn't be necessary after the former, please fix
> that up and re
This has these two patches applied, and it doesn't build.
drm/i915: drop the __i915_active_call pointer packing
drm/i915: Fix crash in auto_retire
The latter patch shouldn't be necessary after the former, please fix
that up and resend and please build test trees before I get them in
future.
Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2021-05-28 10:25:57)
> Hi Dave & Daniel,
>
> Here's drm-intel-gt-next pull request.
>
> Most notably it has the reworked DG1 uAPI (behind CONFIG_BROKEN)
> as requested. Important fix for Gitlab issues #3293 and #3450 and
> one another kernel crash. Adds missing workaround
15 matches
Mail list logo
