Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915: PCH_NOP

2013-03-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:05:41PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:21:02AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > Given certain fusing options discussed in the previous patch, it's > > possible to end up with platforms that normally have PCH but that PCH > > doesn't actually exist.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915: PCH_NOP

2013-03-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:21:02AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Given certain fusing options discussed in the previous patch, it's > possible to end up with platforms that normally have PCH but that PCH > doesn't actually exist. In many cases, this is easily remedied with > setting 0 pipes. This co