Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dmabuf: fix broken build

2021-11-22 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 28/10/2021 09:48, Matthew Auld wrote: On 28/10/2021 02:43, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote: On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 10:48 +0100, Matthew Auld wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 10:44, Jani Nikula wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2021, Matthew Auld wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 09:58, Jani Nikula wrote: On Wed,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dmabuf: fix broken build

2021-10-28 Thread Matthew Auld
On 28/10/2021 02:43, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote: On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 10:48 +0100, Matthew Auld wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 10:44, Jani Nikula wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2021, Matthew Auld wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 09:58, Jani Nikula wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2021, Matthew Auld wrote: On Thu, 2

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dmabuf: fix broken build

2021-10-27 Thread Vivi, Rodrigo
On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 10:48 +0100, Matthew Auld wrote: > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 10:44, Jani Nikula > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021, Matthew Auld > > wrote: > > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 09:58, Jani Nikula > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021, Matthew Auld > > > > wrote: > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dmabuf: fix broken build

2021-10-27 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 05:23:59PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 15:54, Lucas De Marchi wrote: On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 08:57:48AM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote: >On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 13:54, Matthew Auld wrote: >> >> wbinvd_on_all_cpus() is only defined on x86 it seems, plus

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dmabuf: fix broken build

2021-10-27 Thread Matthew Auld
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 15:54, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 08:57:48AM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote: > >On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 13:54, Matthew Auld wrote: > >> > >> wbinvd_on_all_cpus() is only defined on x86 it seems, plus we need to > >> include asm/smp.h here. > >> > >> Report

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dmabuf: fix broken build

2021-10-27 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 08:57:48AM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote: On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 13:54, Matthew Auld wrote: wbinvd_on_all_cpus() is only defined on x86 it seems, plus we need to include asm/smp.h here. Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld Cc: Thomas Hellström Ja

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dmabuf: fix broken build

2021-10-27 Thread Matthew Auld
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 10:44, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021, Matthew Auld wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 09:58, Jani Nikula > > wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, 27 Oct 2021, Matthew Auld wrote: > >> > On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 13:54, Matthew Auld > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> wbinvd_on_

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dmabuf: fix broken build

2021-10-27 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021, Matthew Auld wrote: > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 09:58, Jani Nikula wrote: >> >> On Wed, 27 Oct 2021, Matthew Auld wrote: >> > On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 13:54, Matthew Auld wrote: >> >> >> >> wbinvd_on_all_cpus() is only defined on x86 it seems, plus we need to >> >> include asm/s

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dmabuf: fix broken build

2021-10-27 Thread Matthew Auld
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 09:58, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021, Matthew Auld wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 13:54, Matthew Auld wrote: > >> > >> wbinvd_on_all_cpus() is only defined on x86 it seems, plus we need to > >> include asm/smp.h here. > >> > >> Reported-by: kernel test robo

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dmabuf: fix broken build

2021-10-27 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021, Matthew Auld wrote: >> On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 13:54, Matthew Auld wrote: >>> >>> wbinvd_on_all_cpus() is only defined on x86 it seems, plus we need to >>> include asm/smp.h here. >>> >>> Reported-by: kernel test robot >>> Signed-off

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dmabuf: fix broken build

2021-10-27 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021, Matthew Auld wrote: > On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 13:54, Matthew Auld wrote: >> >> wbinvd_on_all_cpus() is only defined on x86 it seems, plus we need to >> include asm/smp.h here. >> >> Reported-by: kernel test robot >> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld >> Cc: Thomas Hellström > > Ja

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dmabuf: fix broken build

2021-10-27 Thread Matthew Auld
On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 13:54, Matthew Auld wrote: > > wbinvd_on_all_cpus() is only defined on x86 it seems, plus we need to > include asm/smp.h here. > > Reported-by: kernel test robot > Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld > Cc: Thomas Hellström Jani, would it make sense to cherry-pick this to -fixes?

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dmabuf: fix broken build

2021-10-21 Thread Dixit, Ashutosh
On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 05:53:31 -0700, Matthew Auld wrote: > > wbinvd_on_all_cpus() is only defined on x86 it seems, plus we need to > include asm/smp.h here. Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit > Reported-by: kernel test robot > Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld > Cc: Thomas Hellström > --- > drivers/gpu/dr