On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 09:21:51PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > At this point it just seems like you're intentionally making it harder
> > for me to ever merge PPGTT.
>
> I have two issues with the merged patches:
> 1. There's a regression
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> At this point it just seems like you're intentionally making it harder
> for me to ever merge PPGTT.
I have two issues with the merged patches:
1. There's a regression, and QA is meanwhile at the 3rd or so dupe
report. So it's not really an a
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:31:26PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So the first part reworks the gtt ->bind/unbind stuff so that I can rebase the
> -internal try without going berserk. 2nd patch is a bit of fluff removal, next
> for do reorder i915_gem_gtt.c a bit to make more sense (I'v
