Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] BYT DSI Dual Link Support

2014-11-28 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 01:20:06PM +0530, Singh, Gaurav K wrote: > > On 11/24/2014 2:31 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: > >On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, "Singh, Gaurav K" wrote: > >>Hi Jani, > >> > >>Thanks for the review comments. > >> > >>Regarding the first 2 patches, I was doing almost the same thing in my > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] BYT DSI Dual Link Support

2014-11-26 Thread Singh, Gaurav K
On 11/24/2014 2:31 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, "Singh, Gaurav K" wrote: Hi Jani, Thanks for the review comments. Regarding the first 2 patches, I was doing almost the same thing in my 3rd and 4th patch. But your patches are more generic. Regarding the 3rd patch, I have a com

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] BYT DSI Dual Link Support

2014-11-26 Thread Singh, Gaurav K
On 11/24/2014 2:31 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, "Singh, Gaurav K" wrote: Hi Jani, Thanks for the review comments. Regarding the first 2 patches, I was doing almost the same thing in my 3rd and 4th patch. But your patches are more generic. Regarding the 3rd patch, I have a com

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] BYT DSI Dual Link Support

2014-11-24 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, "Singh, Gaurav K" wrote: > Hi Jani, > > Thanks for the review comments. > > Regarding the first 2 patches, I was doing almost the same thing in my > 3rd and 4th patch. But your patches are more generic. > > Regarding the 3rd patch, I have a comment: > > Since in case of dual

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] BYT DSI Dual Link Support

2014-11-24 Thread Singh, Gaurav K
Hi Jani, Thanks for the review comments. Regarding the first 2 patches, I was doing almost the same thing in my 3rd and 4th patch. But your patches are more generic. Regarding the 3rd patch, I have a comment: Since in case of dual link panels, few panels may require sequence to be sent only