There is probably one more place where we want this change, but I will
try to cover that in my 4:2:0 for lspcon patch set.
Meanwhile, please feel free to use:
Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma
Regards
Shashank
On 8/16/2017 8:34 AM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
When LSPCON support was extended to CNL
one
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> When LSPCON support was extended to CNL
> one part was missed on lspcon_init.
>
> So, instead of adding check per platform on lspcon_init
> let's use HAS_LSPCON that is already there for that
> purpose.
I think HAS_LSPCON will require tweaking going forw