Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] BDW swizzling

2014-04-10 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 03:50:35PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 06:51:50PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: [snip] > > > > Do you know if you have a configuration where we try to swizzle? If yes > > and tests/gem_tiled_pread is passing that would give us a nice bit of > > info

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] BDW swizzling

2014-04-10 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 03:50:35PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 06:51:50PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:32:46AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 05:24:07PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > > > > While cruising through the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] BDW swizzling

2014-04-10 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 06:51:50PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:32:46AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 05:24:07PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > > > While cruising through the specs, I noticed a note about swizzling > > > changes on > > > BDW. M

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] BDW swizzling

2014-04-10 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:32:46AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 05:24:07PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > > While cruising through the specs, I noticed a note about swizzling changes > > on > > BDW. My understanding is that we don't need to either initialize swizzling > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] BDW swizzling

2014-04-10 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 05:24:07PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > While cruising through the specs, I noticed a note about swizzling changes on > BDW. My understanding is that we don't need to either initialize swizzling on > the GPU side nor swizzle the address ourselves on the CPU side. > > That