> On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, "Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar"
> wrote:
> > Thought behind this was to use the function where it was defined. But
> > no worries, I have split it with new patch series floated.
>
> Please do not rush to send so many new versions! Let the review come to a
> conclusion first.
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, "Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar"
wrote:
> Thought behind this was to use the function where it was defined. But
> no worries, I have split it with new patch series floated.
Please do not rush to send so many new versions! Let the review come to
a conclusion first.
BR,
Jani.
> -Original Message-
> From: Nikula, Jani
> Sent: Thursday, February 29, 2024 4:08 PM
> To: Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar ;
> intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; Nautiyal, Ankit K
> ; Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar
>
> Subje
On 2/29/2024 4:53 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, "Nautiyal, Ankit K" wrote:
On 2/28/2024 8:08 PM, Mitul Golani wrote:
+enum operation_mode {
+ DP_AS_SDP_AVT_DYNAMIC_VTOTAL = 0x00,
+ DP_AS_SDP_AVT_FIXED_VTOTAL = 0x01,
+ DP_AS_SDP_FAVT_TRR_NOT_REACHED = 0x02,
+
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, "Nautiyal, Ankit K" wrote:
> On 2/28/2024 8:08 PM, Mitul Golani wrote:
>> +enum operation_mode {
>> +DP_AS_SDP_AVT_DYNAMIC_VTOTAL = 0x00,
>> +DP_AS_SDP_AVT_FIXED_VTOTAL = 0x01,
>> +DP_AS_SDP_FAVT_TRR_NOT_REACHED = 0x02,
>> +DP_AS_SDP_FAVT_TRR_REACHED = 0x03
>>
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, Mitul Golani wrote:
> Add structure representing Adaptive Sync Secondary Data Packet (AS SDP).
> Also, add Adaptive Sync SDP logging in drm_dp_helper.c to facilitate
> debugging.
To be honest, the division of patches is a bit weird. There's no reason
to change i915 here, is t
On 2/28/2024 8:08 PM, Mitul Golani wrote:
Add structure representing Adaptive Sync Secondary Data Packet (AS SDP).
Also, add Adaptive Sync SDP logging in drm_dp_helper.c to facilitate
debugging.
--v2:
- Update logging. [Jani, Ankit]
- Use 'as_sdp' instead of 'async' [Ankit]
- Correct define pl
