Hi Jani,
On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 04:38:32PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> With the previous cleanups, the last remaining user of __i915_printk()
> is i915_probe_error(). Switch that to use drm_dbg() and drm_err()
> instead, dropping the request to report bugs in the few remaining
> specific cases.
>
On 07/08/2024 12:40, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Wed, 07 Aug 2024, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 06/08/2024 14:38, Jani Nikula wrote:
With the previous cleanups, the last remaining user of __i915_printk()
is i915_probe_error(). Switch that to use drm_dbg() and drm_err()
instead, dropping the request to
On Wed, 07 Aug 2024, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> On 06/08/2024 14:38, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> With the previous cleanups, the last remaining user of __i915_printk()
>> is i915_probe_error(). Switch that to use drm_dbg() and drm_err()
>> instead, dropping the request to report bugs in the few remaining
>
On 06/08/2024 14:38, Jani Nikula wrote:
With the previous cleanups, the last remaining user of __i915_printk()
is i915_probe_error(). Switch that to use drm_dbg() and drm_err()
instead, dropping the request to report bugs in the few remaining
specific cases.
Aren't those few cases legitimate
-Original Message-
From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Jani
Nikula
Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2024 6:39 AM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Nikula, Jani
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: remove __i915_printk()
>
> With the previous cleanups, the last remaining user of __i915_printk()
> is i9
