Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] drm: Use full allocated minor range for DRM

2024-08-14 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 8:19 PM Michał Winiarski wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 01:38:38PM GMT, Alex Deucher wrote: > > Are there any objections to this series? We have been running into > > this limit as a problem for a while now on big servers. > > I don't think there were any objections, j

Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] drm: Use full allocated minor range for DRM

2024-08-13 Thread James Zhu
Hi Michal I did give Tested-by before. If you need Acks, Here  I can give Acked-by: James Zhu for the series Best Regards! James On 2024-08-13 20:18, Michał Winiarski wrote: On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 01:38:38PM GMT, Alex Deucher wrote: Are there any objections to this series? We have been ru

Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] drm: Use full allocated minor range for DRM

2024-08-13 Thread James Zhu
Hi Michal I did give Tested-by before. If you need Acks, Here I can give Acked-by:JamesZhufortheseries Best Regards! James On 2024-08-13 20:18, Michał Winiarski wrote: On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 01:38:38PM GMT, Alex Deucher wrote: Are there any objections to this series? We have been running

Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] drm: Use full allocated minor range for DRM

2024-08-13 Thread Michał Winiarski
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 01:38:38PM GMT, Alex Deucher wrote: > Are there any objections to this series? We have been running into > this limit as a problem for a while now on big servers. I don't think there were any objections, just a general lack of interest - so there are no R-b / Acks. If you'

Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] drm: Use full allocated minor range for DRM

2024-08-12 Thread Alex Deucher
Are there any objections to this series? We have been running into this limit as a problem for a while now on big servers. Alex On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 5:15 PM Michał Winiarski wrote: > > 64 DRM device nodes is not enough for everyone. > Upgrade it to ~512K (which definitely is more than enough

Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] drm: Use full allocated minor range for DRM

2024-05-03 Thread Eric Pilmore
> On Jul 24, 2023, at 2:14 PM, Michał Winiarski > wrote: > > 64 DRM device nodes is not enough for everyone. > Upgrade it to ~512K (which definitely is more than enough). > > To allow testing userspace support for >64 devices, add additional DRM > modparam (force_extended_minors) which cause

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 0/4] drm: Use full allocated minor range for DRM

2023-08-30 Thread James Zhu
PATCH 1 and 3 are Tested-by:JamesZhu Best Regards! James Zhu On 2023-07-24 17:14, Michał Winiarski wrote: 64 DRM device nodes is not enough for everyone. Upgrade it to ~512K (which definitely is more than enough). To allow testing userspace support for >64 devices, add additional DRM modpara

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 0/4] drm: Use full allocated minor range for DRM

2023-07-24 Thread Michał Winiarski
64 DRM device nodes is not enough for everyone. Upgrade it to ~512K (which definitely is more than enough). To allow testing userspace support for >64 devices, add additional DRM modparam (force_extended_minors) which causes DRM to skip allocating minors in 0-192 range. Additionally - convert mino