On Fri, 2025-01-17 at 21:22 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 09:31:33AM +0200, Jouni Högander wrote:
> > Allow writing PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL using DSB by using
> > intel_de_write_dsb. Do
> > not check intel_dp->psr.lock being held when using DSB. This
> > assertion
> > doesn't make
On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 09:31:33AM +0200, Jouni Högander wrote:
> Allow writing PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL using DSB by using intel_de_write_dsb. Do
> not check intel_dp->psr.lock being held when using DSB. This assertion
> doesn't make sense as in case of using DSB the actual write happens later
> and we ar
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-xe On Behalf Of Jouni
> Högander
> Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2025 1:02 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; intel...@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Hogander, Jouni
> Subject: [PATCH v3 06/10] drm/i915/psr: Allow writing PSR2_MA
Allow writing PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL using DSB by using intel_de_write_dsb. Do
not check intel_dp->psr.lock being held when using DSB. This assertion
doesn't make sense as in case of using DSB the actual write happens later
and we are not taking intel_dp->psr.lock mutex over dsb commit.
Signed-off-by: J
