On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 10:07:23PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 05:35:34PM +0100, Simona Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 06:18:56PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > Atm when the connector is added to the drm_mode_config::connector_list,
> > > the connector may not be ful
On Tue, 03 Dec 2024, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 05:44:27PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> >> It's super tempting for people to just get their jobs done. If doing
>> >> the right thing adds yet another hurdle, we may see more stuff being
>> >> added in drivers instead of drm core.
On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 05:44:27PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> It's super tempting for people to just get their jobs done. If doing
> >> the right thing adds yet another hurdle, we may see more stuff being
> >> added in drivers instead of drm core.
> >
> > I really enjoy hidden threats.
>
> Non
On Mon, 02 Dec 2024, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 02:07:36PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Mon, 02 Dec 2024, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> > It's not about whether we have a problem or not: you introduce new
>> > framework functions, you need to have kunit tests to check their
>> >
On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 02:07:36PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Dec 2024, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > It's not about whether we have a problem or not: you introduce new
> > framework functions, you need to have kunit tests to check their
> > behaviour.
>
> I don't fundamentally disagree wi
On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 03:24:43PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 02:07:36PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Mon, 02 Dec 2024, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > It's not about whether we have a problem or not: you introduce new
> > > framework functions, you need to have kunit tests t
On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 02:07:36PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Dec 2024, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > It's not about whether we have a problem or not: you introduce new
> > framework functions, you need to have kunit tests to check their
> > behaviour.
>
> I don't fundamentally disagree wi
On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 05:35:34PM +0100, Simona Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 06:18:56PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > Atm when the connector is added to the drm_mode_config::connector_list,
> > the connector may not be fully initialized yet. This is not a problem
> > for user space, which
On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 04:07:56PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 03:24:43PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 02:07:36PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > On Mon, 02 Dec 2024, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > > It's not about whether we have a problem or not: you
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 06:18:56PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> Atm when the connector is added to the drm_mode_config::connector_list,
> the connector may not be fully initialized yet. This is not a problem
> for user space, which will see the connector only after it's registered
> later, it could be
On Mon, 02 Dec 2024, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> It's not about whether we have a problem or not: you introduce new
> framework functions, you need to have kunit tests to check their
> behaviour.
I don't fundamentally disagree with that goal, but it does seem like a
pretty drastic policy change. I don
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 06:12:01PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 03:46:28PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 04:26:01PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > Adding more people from DRM core domain. Any comment, objection to this
> > > change?
> > >
> > > On Tue,
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 05:58:56PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2024, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 04:26:01PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> >> Adding more people from DRM core domain. Any comment, objection to this
> >> change?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 06:18
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 03:46:28PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 04:26:01PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > Adding more people from DRM core domain. Any comment, objection to this
> > change?
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 06:18:56PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > Atm when the
On Fri, 29 Nov 2024, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 04:26:01PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
>> Adding more people from DRM core domain. Any comment, objection to this
>> change?
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 06:18:56PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
>> > Atm when the connector is added to the
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 04:26:01PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> Adding more people from DRM core domain. Any comment, objection to this
> change?
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 06:18:56PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > Atm when the connector is added to the drm_mode_config::connector_list,
> > the connecto
Adding more people from DRM core domain. Any comment, objection to this
change?
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 06:18:56PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> Atm when the connector is added to the drm_mode_config::connector_list,
> the connector may not be fully initialized yet. This is not a problem
> for user sp
Atm when the connector is added to the drm_mode_config::connector_list,
the connector may not be fully initialized yet. This is not a problem
for user space, which will see the connector only after it's registered
later, it could be a problem for in-kernel users looking up connectors
via the above
18 matches
Mail list logo
