On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 09:41:47PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Raag,
>
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 04:36:18PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > Current live_rps_control() implementation errors out on throttling.
> > This was done with the assumption that throttling to minimum frequency
> > is a catastr
Hi Raag,
On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 04:36:18PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> Current live_rps_control() implementation errors out on throttling.
> This was done with the assumption that throttling to minimum frequency
> is a catastrophic failure, which is incorrect. Throttling can happen
> due to variet
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 11:28:47AM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 04:36:18PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > Current live_rps_control() implementation errors out on throttling.
> > This was done with the assumption that throttling to minimum frequency
> > is a catastrophic failure,
On 1/2/2025 3:06 AM, Raag Jadav wrote:
Current live_rps_control() implementation errors out on throttling.
This was done with the assumption that throttling to minimum frequency
is a catastrophic failure, which is incorrect. Throttling can happen
due to variety of reasons and often times out of
On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 04:36:18PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> Current live_rps_control() implementation errors out on throttling.
> This was done with the assumption that throttling to minimum frequency
> is a catastrophic failure, which is incorrect. Throttling can happen
> due to variety of reaso
Current live_rps_control() implementation errors out on throttling.
This was done with the assumption that throttling to minimum frequency
is a catastrophic failure, which is incorrect. Throttling can happen
due to variety of reasons and often times out of our control. Also,
the resulting frequency
