sts.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: Syrjala, Ville
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/watermark: Refactor dpkgc code
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I guess this is mostly ok. But some minor comments...
> >
> > On Thu, 2024-11-14 at 10:00 +0530, Suraj Kandpal wrote:
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Govindapillai, Vinod
> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2024 6:12 PM
> To: Kandpal, Suraj ; intel...@lists.freedesktop.org;
> intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Syrjala, Ville
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/watermark: Refactor dpkgc
Hi,
I guess this is mostly ok. But some minor comments...
On Thu, 2024-11-14 at 10:00 +0530, Suraj Kandpal wrote:
> We move our dpkgc function for the below reasons:
> - We want to make sure we have all the required values specially
> linetime which is computed after intel_wm_compute, this will a
We move our dpkgc function for the below reasons:
- We want to make sure we have all the required values specially
linetime which is computed after intel_wm_compute, this will also
help implement some WA's which require linetime.
-We do not want to write into any registers during compute_config pha
