On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 04:40:01PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2025, Mika Kahola wrote:
> > For PLL programming for C10 and C20 we don't need to
> > carry crtc_state but instead use only necessary parts
> > of the crtc_state i.e. pll_state.
>
> This is not a good enough justificati
> -Original Message-
> From: Jani Nikula
> Sent: Wednesday, 29 January 2025 16.40
> To: Kahola, Mika ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org;
> intel-
> x...@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Deak, Imre ; Kahola, Mika
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/display: Drop crt
On Wed, 29 Jan 2025, Mika Kahola wrote:
> For PLL programming for C10 and C20 we don't need to
> carry crtc_state but instead use only necessary parts
> of the crtc_state i.e. pll_state.
This is not a good enough justification alone. Usually we pass
crtc_state around because we're going to need m
For PLL programming for C10 and C20 we don't need to
carry crtc_state but instead use only necessary parts
of the crtc_state i.e. pll_state.
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c | 109 +++
1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
d
