RE: [PATCH 07/17] drm/i915/ddi: Simplify waiting for a port to idle via DDI_BUF_CTL

2025-02-12 Thread Kahola, Mika
> -Original Message- > From: Intel-xe On Behalf Of Jani > Nikula > Sent: Wednesday, 5 February 2025 15.02 > To: Deak, Imre > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; intel...@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/17] drm/i915/ddi: Simplify waiting for

Re: [PATCH 07/17] drm/i915/ddi: Simplify waiting for a port to idle via DDI_BUF_CTL

2025-02-05 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 05 Feb 2025, Imre Deak wrote: > On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 02:35:18PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Wed, 29 Jan 2025, Imre Deak wrote: >> > When waiting for a port to idle, there is no point in distinguishing the >> > platform specific timeouts, instead of just using the maximum timeout. >

Re: [PATCH 07/17] drm/i915/ddi: Simplify waiting for a port to idle via DDI_BUF_CTL

2025-02-05 Thread Imre Deak
On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 02:35:18PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jan 2025, Imre Deak wrote: > > When waiting for a port to idle, there is no point in distinguishing the > > platform specific timeouts, instead of just using the maximum timeout. > > Why? > > All of this sounds kind of rea

Re: [PATCH 07/17] drm/i915/ddi: Simplify waiting for a port to idle via DDI_BUF_CTL

2025-02-05 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 29 Jan 2025, Imre Deak wrote: > When waiting for a port to idle, there is no point in distinguishing the > platform specific timeouts, instead of just using the maximum timeout. Why? All of this sounds kind of reasonable, but we'll need a better rationale than "there is no point". > Sim

[PATCH 07/17] drm/i915/ddi: Simplify waiting for a port to idle via DDI_BUF_CTL

2025-01-29 Thread Imre Deak
When waiting for a port to idle, there is no point in distinguishing the platform specific timeouts, instead of just using the maximum timeout. Simplify things accordingly, describing the Bspec platform specific timeouts in code comments. Signed-off-by: Imre Deak --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display