Quoting Luca Coelho (2024-11-01 07:57:58-03:00)
>On Mon, 2024-10-21 at 19:27 -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote:
>> In upcoming display changes, we will modify the DMC wakelock MMIO
>> waiting code to choose a non-sleeping variant implementation, because
>> the wakelock is also taking in atomic context.
>>
On Mon, 2024-10-21 at 19:27 -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote:
> In upcoming display changes, we will modify the DMC wakelock MMIO
> waiting code to choose a non-sleeping variant implementation, because
> the wakelock is also taking in atomic context.
>
> While xe provides an explicit parameter (namely "
In upcoming display changes, we will modify the DMC wakelock MMIO
waiting code to choose a non-sleeping variant implementation, because
the wakelock is also taking in atomic context.
While xe provides an explicit parameter (namely "atomic") to prevent
xe_mmio_wait32() from sleeping, i915 does not
