Hi,
On 11.02.25 00:07, Andi Shyti wrote:
actually would be better if we apply the i915 part in drm-tip
rather than waiting for kernel releases to receive this change in
our branch. It has been source of conflicts and headaches.
May I ask Markus to split the patch in two parts and we handle
the
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 02:39:43PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hey Markus,
>
> Thanks for this. I hadn't realized that next_pseudo_random32() only
> had two users left. Excellent.
>
> I'll queue this up in the random tree (unless there are objections
> from the maintainers of that tes
next_pseudo_random32 implements a LCG with known bad
statistical properties and is only used in two pieces
of testing code. Remove and convert users to the remaining
single PRNG interface in prandom/random32.
This removes another option of using an insecure PRNG.
This is a preliminary patch for f
Hey Markus,
Thanks for this. I hadn't realized that next_pseudo_random32() only
had two users left. Excellent.
I'll queue this up in the random tree (unless there are objections
from the maintainers of that test code).
Jason
