On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 03:58:03PM -0800, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 06:10:34PM -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 02:25:57PM -0800, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
> >
> > drm/i915/pmu as tag please...
>
> will do
>
> >
> > > When running igt@gem_ex
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 06:10:34PM -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 02:25:57PM -0800, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
drm/i915/pmu as tag please...
will do
When running igt@gem_exec_balancer@individual for multiple iterations,
it is seen that the delta busyness returned by P
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 02:25:57PM -0800, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
drm/i915/pmu as tag please...
> When running igt@gem_exec_balancer@individual for multiple iterations,
> it is seen that the delta busyness returned by PMU is 0. The issue stems
> from a combination of 2 implementation specifi
When running igt@gem_exec_balancer@individual for multiple iterations,
it is seen that the delta busyness returned by PMU is 0. The issue stems
from a combination of 2 implementation specific details:
1) gt_park is throttling __update_guc_busyness_stats() so that it does
not hog PCI bandwidth for
