On Wed, 08 May 2024, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 11:53:40AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Mon, 06 May 2024, Ville Syrjala wrote:
>> > From: Ville Syrjälä
>> >
>> > For some reason xe and i915 each have an identical (fortunately)
>> > copy of intel_fbdev_fb.h. The xe copy act
On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 10:52:54PM GMT, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 11:53:40AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Mon, 06 May 2024, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> For some reason xe and i915 each have an identical (fortunately)
> copy of intel_fbdev_fb.h. The xe copy
On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 11:53:40AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 06 May 2024, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > For some reason xe and i915 each have an identical (fortunately)
> > copy of intel_fbdev_fb.h. The xe copy actually only gets included
> > by xe's intel_fbdev_f
On Mon, 06 May 2024, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> For some reason xe and i915 each have an identical (fortunately)
> copy of intel_fbdev_fb.h. The xe copy actually only gets included
> by xe's intel_fbdev_fb.c, and the i915 copy by everyone else,
> include intel_fbdev.c which is
From: Ville Syrjälä
For some reason xe and i915 each have an identical (fortunately)
copy of intel_fbdev_fb.h. The xe copy actually only gets included
by xe's intel_fbdev_fb.c, and the i915 copy by everyone else,
include intel_fbdev.c which is the actual caller of the
functions declared in the he
