On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 10:51:03AM -0800, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 06:57:14 -0800, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 12/18/23 15:30, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > Ideally this header could be included without the CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION
> > > and it would take care itself for th
On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 06:57:14 -0800, Thomas Hellström wrote:
>
>
> On 12/18/23 15:30, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > Ideally this header could be included without the CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION
> > and it would take care itself for the includes it needs.
> > So, let's temporary workaround this by moving this b
On 12/18/23 15:30, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
Ideally this header could be included without the CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION
and it would take care itself for the includes it needs.
So, let's temporary workaround this by moving this below and including
only when CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION is selected to avoid b
Ideally this header could be included without the CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION
and it would take care itself for the includes it needs.
So, let's temporary workaround this by moving this below and including
only when CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION is selected to avoid build breakages.
Another solution would be