On 2025-02-13 9:28 a.m., Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 13/02/2025 13:36, Liang, Kan wrote:
>> On 2025-02-12 11:13 p.m., Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 12:19:15PM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
On 2025-01-21 11:59 a.m., Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 202
On 13/02/2025 13:36, Liang, Kan wrote:
On 2025-02-12 11:13 p.m., Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 12:19:15PM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
On 2025-01-21 11:59 a.m., Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 10:53:31AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
On 2025-01-21 9:29 a.m., Lucas
On 2025-02-12 11:13 p.m., Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 12:19:15PM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2025-01-21 11:59 a.m., Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 10:53:31AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
On 2025-01-21 9:29 a.m., Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 12:19:15PM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
On 2025-01-21 11:59 a.m., Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 10:53:31AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
On 2025-01-21 9:29 a.m., Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 08:42:41PM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
-static int
On 16/01/2025 22:24, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
Since commit 4ba4f1afb6a9 ("perf: Generic hotplug support for a PMU with
a scope"), there's generic support for system-wide counters and
integration with cpu hotplug. Set our scope to PERF_PMU_SCOPE_SYS_WIDE
instead of all the boilerplate code for han
On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 10:32:11AM -0600, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 04:46:21PM -0800, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
Hi Lucas,
Mostly a bunch of questions since I think I am missing something.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 10:59:08AM -0600, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21,
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 04:46:21PM -0800, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
Hi Lucas,
Mostly a bunch of questions since I think I am missing something.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 10:59:08AM -0600, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 10:53:31AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
On 2025-01-21 9:29
Hi Lucas,
Mostly a bunch of questions since I think I am missing something.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 10:59:08AM -0600, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 10:53:31AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
On 2025-01-21 9:29 a.m., Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 08:42:41PM -0500,
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 06:06:29PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 23/01/2025 16:27, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 09:43:35AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 20/01/2025 22:57, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 10:08:39AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
On 2025-01-16
On 23/01/2025 16:27, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 09:43:35AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 20/01/2025 22:57, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 10:08:39AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
On 2025-01-16 5:24 p.m., Lucas De Marchi wrote:
Since commit 4ba4f1afb6a9 ("p
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 09:43:35AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 20/01/2025 22:57, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 10:08:39AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
On 2025-01-16 5:24 p.m., Lucas De Marchi wrote:
Since commit 4ba4f1afb6a9 ("perf: Generic hotplug support for a PMU with
a
On 20/01/2025 22:57, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 10:08:39AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
On 2025-01-16 5:24 p.m., Lucas De Marchi wrote:
Since commit 4ba4f1afb6a9 ("perf: Generic hotplug support for a PMU with
a scope"), there's generic support for system-wide counters and
in
On 2025-01-21 11:59 a.m., Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 10:53:31AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2025-01-21 9:29 a.m., Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 08:42:41PM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
>>> -static int i915_pmu_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu, struc
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 10:53:31AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
On 2025-01-21 9:29 a.m., Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 08:42:41PM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
-static int i915_pmu_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node
*node)
-{
- struct i915_pmu *pmu = hlist_entry_safe(n
On 2025-01-21 9:29 a.m., Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 08:42:41PM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
> -static int i915_pmu_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node
> *node)
> -{
> - struct i915_pmu *pmu = hlist_entry_safe(node, typeof(*pmu),
> cpuhp.node);
On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 08:42:41PM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
-static int i915_pmu_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node
*node)
-{
- struct i915_pmu *pmu = hlist_entry_safe(node, typeof(*pmu),
cpuhp.node);
- unsigned int target = i915_pmu_target_cpu;
-
- /*
- * Unregistering
On 2025-01-20 5:57 p.m., Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 10:08:39AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2025-01-16 5:24 p.m., Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>>> Since commit 4ba4f1afb6a9 ("perf: Generic hotplug support for a PMU with
>>> a scope"), there's generic support for system-wi
On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 10:08:39AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
On 2025-01-16 5:24 p.m., Lucas De Marchi wrote:
Since commit 4ba4f1afb6a9 ("perf: Generic hotplug support for a PMU with
a scope"), there's generic support for system-wide counters and
integration with cpu hotplug. Set our scope to PE
On 2025-01-16 5:24 p.m., Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> Since commit 4ba4f1afb6a9 ("perf: Generic hotplug support for a PMU with
> a scope"), there's generic support for system-wide counters and
> integration with cpu hotplug. Set our scope to PERF_PMU_SCOPE_SYS_WIDE
> instead of all the boilerplate c
Since commit 4ba4f1afb6a9 ("perf: Generic hotplug support for a PMU with
a scope"), there's generic support for system-wide counters and
integration with cpu hotplug. Set our scope to PERF_PMU_SCOPE_SYS_WIDE
instead of all the boilerplate code for handling hotplug.
Cc: Kan Liang
Cc: Peter Zijlstr
20 matches
Mail list logo
