On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>> > Andrew, do you have anything hacked together for this yet?
>>
>> Nope. I gave up because I couldn't even get the mode to set. :)
>
> Ok well you should be able to now. :) Using the patchset I posted
> earlier along with the two attached p
> > Andrew, do you have anything hacked together for this yet?
>
> Nope. I gave up because I couldn't even get the mode to set. :)
Ok well you should be able to now. :) Using the patchset I posted
earlier along with the two attached patches, the testdisplay program in
intel-gpu-tools will set a
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:03:56 -0400
> Adam Jackson wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 16:29 -0400, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> > Does that include not breaking DirectColor? If we program the gamma
>> > ramp to 129 slots, old userspace submi
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:03:56 -0400
Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 16:29 -0400, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>
> > Does that include not breaking DirectColor? If we program the gamma
> > ramp to 129 slots, old userspace submits 256 entries that are not
> > monotonic, and we decimate the
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 16:29 -0400, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> Does that include not breaking DirectColor? If we program the gamma
> ramp to 129 slots, old userspace submits 256 entries that are not
> monotonic, and we decimate the gamma ramp, we'll display the wrong
> thing. I have no idea if th
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:29:06 -0400, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:00:30 -0400, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> >> AFAICT intel hardware wants a 129-entry LUT when using high precision
> >> gamma ramps. Rather than hacking so
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:00:30 -0400, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>> AFAICT intel hardware wants a 129-entry LUT when using high precision
>> gamma ramps. Rather than hacking some kind of decimation into the
>> kernel driver (and thus silently bre
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:00:30 -0400, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> AFAICT intel hardware wants a 129-entry LUT when using high precision
> gamma ramps. Rather than hacking some kind of decimation into the
> kernel driver (and thus silently breaking DirectColor), I'd like to
> teach userspace how to d
AFAICT intel hardware wants a 129-entry LUT when using high precision
gamma ramps. Rather than hacking some kind of decimation into the
kernel driver (and thus silently breaking DirectColor), I'd like to
teach userspace how to deal with variable gamma sizes.
gnome-color-manager already more-or-le
