Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Aug 21 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:04:37AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Daniel Vetter >> > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Daniel Vetter >> >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Aug 21 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:04:37AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Daniel Vetter >> > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Daniel Vetter >> >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Aug 21 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-23 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:04:37AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Daniel Vetter >> > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Daniel Vetter >> >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Aug 21 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-23 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:04:37AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Daniel Vetter > > wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Daniel Vetter > >> wrote: > >>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Sedat Dilek

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Aug 21 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-23 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Daniel Vetter >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: dmesg (a lot of traces) and kernel-config attached. UXA

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Aug 21 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-23 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> dmesg (a lot of traces) and kernel-config attached. >>> >>> UXA causes still screen corruption. >> >> Hm, was only a slim chanc

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Aug 21 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-22 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> dmesg (a lot of traces) and kernel-config attached. >> >> UXA causes still screen corruption. > > Hm, was only a slim chance that this patch would fix anything - I > think you'd always s

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Aug 21 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-22 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > dmesg (a lot of traces) and kernel-config attached. > > UXA causes still screen corruption. Hm, was only a slim chance that this patch would fix anything - I think you'd always see an oops when you'd hit this bug instead of just a bit of corru

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Aug 21 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-22 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 08:32:47AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > It's independent of the applied patch. > My problem goes away with SNA but still exists with UXA. > > As said in my previous analysis... switching back to Ubuntu's graphics > did not show the symptoms, too. > > It's interesting to see

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Aug 21 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-21 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 08:11:27PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:35:08PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Stephen Rothwell

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Aug 21 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-21 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 08:11:27PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:35:08PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Stephen Rothwell > >> wrote: > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > There will be no

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Aug 21 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-21 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:35:08PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > There will be no linux-next trees on Aug 23 or 26. >> > >> > Changes since 20130820: >> > >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Aug 21 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-21 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:35:08PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > There will be no linux-next trees on Aug 23 or 26. > > > > Changes since 20130820: > > > > New tree: aio-direct > > > > Removed tree: xilinx (at maintaine

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Aug 21 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-21 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > There will be no linux-next trees on Aug 23 or 26. > > Changes since 20130820: > > New tree: aio-direct > > Removed tree: xilinx (at maintainer's request) > > The xfs tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a co