On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 01:53:47 +0200
Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 01:48:13AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > Jesse,
> >
> > I was playing with a static analyzer and it flagged the following
> > code of yours.
> >
> > Is the val = 0 directly after the register read correct and int
Jesse,
I was playing with a static analyzer and it flagged the following
code of yours.
Is the val = 0 directly after the register read correct and intended?
commit 89b667f86a62a99a7b484a7e1b3f8f7a108a7dee
Author: Jesse Barnes
Date: Thu Apr 18 14:51:36 2013 -0700
drm/i915: update VLV PL
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 01:48:13AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> Jesse,
>
> I was playing with a static analyzer and it flagged the following
> code of yours.
>
> Is the val = 0 directly after the register read correct and intended?
Also the same pattern is in other places, like vlv_pre_enable_d
