Re: [Intel-gfx] improve use_mm / unuse_mm v2

2020-04-17 Thread Jens Axboe
On 4/15/20 11:31 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi all, > > this series improves the use_mm / unuse_mm interface by better > documenting the assumptions, and my taking the set_fs manipulations > spread over the callers into the core API. > > Changes since v1: > - drop a few patches > - fix a co

Re: [Intel-gfx] improve use_mm / unuse_mm v2

2020-04-16 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 08:17:44PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 07:31:55AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > this series improves the use_mm / unuse_mm interface by better > > documenting the assumptions, and my taking the set_fs manipulations > > spread over the callers

Re: [Intel-gfx] improve use_mm / unuse_mm v2

2020-04-16 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 07:31:55AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > this series improves the use_mm / unuse_mm interface by better > documenting the assumptions, and my taking the set_fs manipulations > spread over the callers into the core API. I appreciate all the work you're doing here. Do yo

[Intel-gfx] improve use_mm / unuse_mm v2

2020-04-15 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Hi all, this series improves the use_mm / unuse_mm interface by better documenting the assumptions, and my taking the set_fs manipulations spread over the callers into the core API. Changes since v1: - drop a few patches - fix a comment typo - cover the newly merged use_mm/unuse_mm caller in v