Re: [Intel-gfx] i915_gem_evict_something in sysprof trace using VBOs

2010-11-05 Thread Peter Clifton
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 11:44 +, Peter Clifton wrote: > I take bets its "something I've done wrong", as usually seems to be the > way, but for now - if I just use glBufferSubData to upload changed data > only, I get rendering corruption. It works fine with > LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE=1 though, so th

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915_gem_evict_something in sysprof trace using VBOs

2010-11-05 Thread Peter Clifton
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 10:35 +, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 10:21:07 +, Peter Clifton wrote: > > I was playing with my VBO code, and noticed this sysprof trace > > (non-interesting stuff pruned): > > > > drm_ioctl 0.13% 56.08% > > i9

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915_gem_evict_something in sysprof trace using VBOs

2010-11-05 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 10:21:07 +, Peter Clifton wrote: > I was playing with my VBO code, and noticed this sysprof trace > (non-interesting stuff pruned): > > drm_ioctl 0.13% 56.08% > i915_gem_execbuffer20.00% 32.50% > i

[Intel-gfx] i915_gem_evict_something in sysprof trace using VBOs

2010-11-05 Thread Peter Clifton
I was playing with my VBO code, and noticed this sysprof trace (non-interesting stuff pruned): drm_ioctl 0.13% 56.08% i915_gem_execbuffer20.00% 32.50% i915_gem_do_execbuffer0.08% 32.50% i915_