Re: [Intel-gfx] i915GM 2D+3D intel driver regression

2010-05-06 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 10:47 +0200, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > > > > xorg-x11-drv-intel > n require kernel > n and libdrm > n . > > What does that "n" mean? I don't understand that sentence. n is a number > > So the order should be: > > 1st kernel > > 2nd libdrm > > 3 mesa. > > 4 Xserver > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915GM 2D+3D intel driver regression

2010-05-06 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Wednesday May 5 2010 19:17:51 Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: > On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 15:59 +0200, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > > On Wednesday May 5 2010 03:31:51 Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: > > > If you use intel-drv shipped on distros, should have problems , do you > > > use ubuntu ? > > > > Int

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915GM 2D+3D intel driver regression

2010-05-05 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 15:59 +0200, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > On Wednesday May 5 2010 03:31:51 Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: > > If you use intel-drv shipped on distros, should have problems , do you > > use ubuntu ? > > > > Intel-drv? Don't have such a package... I should have problems? :S xor

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915GM 2D+3D intel driver regression

2010-05-05 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Wednesday May 5 2010 03:31:51 Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: > If you use intel-drv shipped on distros, should have problems , do you > use ubuntu ? > Intel-drv? Don't have such a package... I should have problems? :S I'm happily running Archlinux > I got a desktop with 945GM , don't have perf

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915GM 2D+3D intel driver regression

2010-05-04 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
2.6.33.3-72.fc13.i686 > xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.11.0-3.fc13.i686 > made 2D works quick enough. > > I can confirm - there was big improvement. > > Thanks. > > --- On Wed, 5/5/10, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: > > > From: Sergio Monteiro Basto > > Subject:

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915GM 2D+3D intel driver regression

2010-05-04 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
On Sun, 2010-05-02 at 21:48 +0200, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > On Friday April 30 2010 22:56:12 Clemens Eisserer wrote: > > And although so much has changed, I still > > - Can't scroll through my gmail inbox "fluently", not with firefox > > nore with Opera > > - Can't play even simple OpenGL games

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915GM 2D+3D intel driver regression

2010-05-02 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Friday April 30 2010 22:56:12 Clemens Eisserer wrote: > And although so much has changed, I still > - Can't scroll through my gmail inbox "fluently", not with firefox > nore with Opera > - Can't play even simple OpenGL games at 1280x800 > - Still have to disable Composition because it dramatical

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915GM 2D+3D intel driver regression

2010-05-01 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 22:56 +0200, Clemens Eisserer wrote: > > Oh, I get it. You don't understand software. > > Well although the whole discussion isn't really focussed, he has one point. > The overall desktop experience is way better on the old terminals > running Fedora-7 (intel-2.2 / XAA) tha

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915GM 2D+3D intel driver regression

2010-04-30 Thread Sven Arvidsson
Why this need to assume malignancy and throw a lot of accusations around? I just gave the examples you mentioned a try on my i915 (with up to date drivers) and I can't reproduce this at all. Performance is good with gears, and CPU usage when playing video low. Chill, count to ten, punch a pillow,

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915GM 2D+3D intel driver regression

2010-04-30 Thread Adam Jackson
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 22:56 +0200, Clemens Eisserer wrote: > > Oh, I get it. You don't understand software. > > Well although the whole discussion isn't really focussed, he has one point. That's as may be true. But the leap from "it's worse" to "because it supports so many devices" is just nons

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915GM 2D+3D intel driver regression

2010-04-30 Thread Clemens Eisserer
> Oh, I get it.  You don't understand software. Well although the whole discussion isn't really focussed, he has one point. The overall desktop experience is way better on the old terminals running Fedora-7 (intel-2.2 / XAA) than on my i945GM based laptop running Fedora-12 + intel-2.11. And altho

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915GM 2D+3D intel driver regression

2010-04-30 Thread Adam Jackson
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 12:25 -0700, SD wrote: > But, why not to split intel driver between old cards and new ones? > Every one knows that it is impossible to provide full support for: > 810, i810-dc100, i810e, i815, i830M, 845G, 852GM/855GM, 865G, 915G, > E7221 (i915), 915GM, 945G, 945GM, 945GME,

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915GM 2D+3D intel driver regression

2010-04-30 Thread SD
you. --- On Fri, 4/30/10, Alan W. Irwin wrote: > From: Alan W. Irwin > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] i915GM 2D+3D intel driver regression > To: "SD" > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Date: Friday, April 30, 2010, 10:28 PM > On 2010-04-30 08:45-0700 SD wrote: >

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915GM 2D+3D intel driver regression

2010-04-30 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2010-04-30 08:45-0700 SD wrote: Dear all. I have been using linux for 2 years already. And I use it on intel 915 GM video card on Lenovo laptop. With: (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules//drivers/intel_drv.so (II) Module intel: vendor="X.Org Foundation" compiled for 1.5.2, module ver

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915GM 2D+3D intel driver regression

2010-04-30 Thread Felix Miata
On 2010/04/30 08:45 (GMT-0700) SD composed: > I have been using linux for 2 years already. And I use it on intel 915 GM > video card: > X uses 4% of CPU > SMplayer 10-12% of CPU. > GLXgear gives me: > 3216 frames in 5.0 seconds = 643.117 FPS > Now I tried Fedora13 (test) with intel driver: > A

[Intel-gfx] i915GM 2D+3D intel driver regression

2010-04-30 Thread SD
Dear all. I have been using linux for 2 years already. And I use it on intel 915 GM video card on Lenovo laptop. With: (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules//drivers/intel_drv.so (II) Module intel: vendor="X.Org Foundation" compiled for 1.5.2, module version = 2.5.0 Module class: X.O