Re: [Intel-gfx] dual head inteldrmfb

2010-10-22 Thread Ali Gholami Rudi
Hi, > Try fbpercrtc=1 as a kernel option This options seems to be a no-op since commit 785b93ef. Maybe drm_fb_helper_single_fb_probe() can be tweaked for that, or maybe there's already an option for it? Thanks, Ali ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] dual head inteldrmfb

2010-10-22 Thread Damnshock
On Thursday 21 October 2010 23:29:15 Ali Gholami Rudi wrote: > Is it possible to have two inteldrmfb devices (/dev/fb[01]) > for two output ports using i915 without xorg? > > If not, is it possible to force the default inteldrmfb output > port? Here I want my framebuffer size match my netbook's >

[Intel-gfx] dual head inteldrmfb

2010-10-21 Thread Ali Gholami Rudi
Hi, Is it possible to have two inteldrmfb devices (/dev/fb[01]) for two output ports using i915 without xorg? If not, is it possible to force the default inteldrmfb output port? Here I want my framebuffer size match my netbook's external LCD rather than its tiny display. Thanks, Ali __