Re: [Intel-gfx] drm/i915/ns2501: Update from git working

2013-10-09 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Thomas Richter wrote: > On 09.10.2013 00:00, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> >> >> My drm-intel git branch doesn't yet have the two patches that are meant to >> replace your ns2501 hack ... So I'm not too sure what exactly you've >> tested that made things magically better?

Re: [Intel-gfx] drm/i915/ns2501: Update from git working

2013-10-09 Thread Thomas Richter
On 09.10.2013 00:00, Daniel Vetter wrote: My drm-intel git branch doesn't yet have the two patches that are meant to replace your ns2501 hack ... So I'm not too sure what exactly you've tested that made things magically better? Is there a difference between the 3.12rc4 from kernel.org and the

Re: [Intel-gfx] drm/i915/ns2501: Update from git working

2013-10-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 10:56:41PM +0200, Thomas Richter wrote: > Hi Daniel, dear kernel developers, > > just tried the 3.12.rc3+ from the intel-drm git. This version > *worked* again, pretty much the same way the 3.10.10 "worked". > > Side effects are, however, quite the same when you connect an

[Intel-gfx] drm/i915/ns2501: Update from git working

2013-10-08 Thread Thomas Richter
Hi Daniel, dear kernel developers, just tried the 3.12.rc3+ from the intel-drm git. This version *worked* again, pretty much the same way the 3.10.10 "worked". Side effects are, however, quite the same when you connect an external monitor: If connected while the gdm login screen is on, the