Re: [Intel-gfx] VT switchless suspend/resume

2013-03-07 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:31:42 -0800 Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:19:53 -0300 > Paulo Zanoni wrote: > > > Hi > > > > 2013/2/19 Paulo Zanoni : > > > 2013/2/19 Jesse Barnes : > > >> Updated with the fix from Ville. > > > > > > Very briefly tested on SNB (LVDS) and HSW (eDP + DP). S

Re: [Intel-gfx] VT switchless suspend/resume

2013-02-25 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:19:53 -0300 Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Hi > > 2013/2/19 Paulo Zanoni : > > 2013/2/19 Jesse Barnes : > >> Updated with the fix from Ville. > > > > Very briefly tested on SNB (LVDS) and HSW (eDP + DP). Suspend-to-ram + > > resume still work. > > So, today I looked at the patches

Re: [Intel-gfx] VT switchless suspend/resume

2013-02-19 Thread Paulo Zanoni
2013/2/19 Jesse Barnes : > Updated with the fix from Ville. Very briefly tested on SNB (LVDS) and HSW (eDP + DP). Suspend-to-ram + resume still work. > > ___ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailm

[Intel-gfx] VT switchless suspend/resume

2013-02-19 Thread Jesse Barnes
Updated with the fix from Ville. ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[Intel-gfx] VT switchless suspend/resume

2013-02-02 Thread Jesse Barnes
Finally got around to updating these patches here at FOSDEM. I made the core PM support for this into a function so multiple drivers can indicate their support and we'll be conservative about doing the switch if no drivers call in or if any driver indicates it can't support VT switchless suspend/r