Hi all,
Already the first testing cycle for 3.7. Highlights:
- Some prep patches for hsw dp and the modeset rework.
- support for the ns2501 dvo from Thomas Richter (rather hackish though,
but seems to work).
- flushing_list removal (Chris).
- reg_read interface (Ben)
- pimp the wait_timeout ioc
Hi all,
Slightly longer -next cycle than usual, somehow almost nothing was queued
up last week, so I waited a bit longer. But now there's still a sizeable
chunk of patches merged. Highlights:
- Remaining vlv patches from Jesse et al.
- Some hw workarounds from Jesse
- hw context support from Ben
-
Hi Dave,
rc2 is out the door so I've figured I'll annoy you with the first -next
pull request for 3.6 already. Highlights:
- new wait_rendring_timeout interface (Ben)
- l3 cache remapping and error uevent support (Ben)
- even more infoframes work from Paulo
- gen4 hotplug rework from Chris
- prep
Hi all,
3.6 merging is already fully engaged, so here's a new -next to shred. I've
pushed updated -next and -testing branches, as usual. Highlights:
- new wait_rendring_timeout interface (Ben)
- l3 cache remapping and error uevent support (Ben)
- even more infoframes work from Paulo
- gen4 hotplug
Hi all,
New stuff to test in -next (we've the testing branch updated as usual).
Highlights:
- sparse fixes from Ben.
- tons of little cleanups from Chris all over: tiling_changed
clarification, deferred_free list removal, ...
- fix up irq handler on gen2 & gen3 + related cleanups from Chris
- pr
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 01:45:42PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> A new drm-intel-next pull. Highlights:
> - More gmbus patches from Daniel Kurtz, I think gmbus is now ready, all
> known issues fixed.
> - Fencing cleanup and pipelined fencing removal from Chris.
> - rc6 residency int
Hi Dave,
A new drm-intel-next pull. Highlights:
- More gmbus patches from Daniel Kurtz, I think gmbus is now ready, all
known issues fixed.
- Fencing cleanup and pipelined fencing removal from Chris.
- rc6 residency interface from Ben, useful for powertop.
- Cleanups and code reorg around the ri
Okay, I'm just going to write mail to you for that issue.
Thanks
--Yi Sun
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 3:39 PM
> To: Intel Graphics Development; Sun, Yi
> Subject: Re: Updated -nex
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 06:40:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Highlights:
> - More gmbus patches from Daniel Kurtz, I think gmbus is now ready, all
> known issues fixed.
> - Fencing cleanup and pipelined fencing removal from Chris.
> - rc6 residency interface from Ben, useful for
Hi all,
Highlights:
- More gmbus patches from Daniel Kurtz, I think gmbus is now ready, all
known issues fixed.
- Fencing cleanup and pipelined fencing removal from Chris.
- rc6 residency interface from Ben, useful for powertop.
- Cleanups and code reorg around the ringbuffer code (Ben&me).
- Us
Am Mittwoch, den 11.04.2012, 08:24 + schrieb Sun, Yi:
[…]
> Thank all your comments.
Thank you for your prompt reply and your work on the Intel-gfx driver.
Thanks,
Paul
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Int
> > We finished a new round of kernel testing. The version of kernel is:
> > Kernel: (drm-intel-testing)9d0b5b5468650e0ac72a7786cf6625963f926d4d
> > Merge: ec34a01 b4db1e3
> > Author: Daniel Vetter
> > Date: Mon Apr 9 18:12:03 2012 +0200
> >
> > We covered the platform IvyBridge, SandyBridge, Ir
Dear Yi¹,
Am Mittwoch, den 11.04.2012, 03:20 + schrieb Sun, Yi:
> We finished a new round of kernel testing. The version of kernel is:
> Kernel: (drm-intel-testing)9d0b5b5468650e0ac72a7786cf6625963f926d4d
> Merge: ec34a01 b4db1e3
> Author: Daniel Vetter
> Date: Mon Apr 9 18:12:03 2012 +02
Hi all,
We finished a new round of kernel testing. The version of kernel is:
Kernel: (drm-intel-testing)9d0b5b5468650e0ac72a7786cf6625963f926d4d
Merge: ec34a01 b4db1e3
Author: Daniel Vetter
Date: Mon Apr 9 18:12:03 2012 +0200
We covered the platform IvyBridge, SandyBridge, IronLake, G45 and Pi
> Sun, I'm sorry for the additional work, but please re-run any gpu render and
> performance testing on this new branch. Modeset issues and output testing
> should not be affected by this, so there's no need to re-run these tests you
> have already done on the old -testing branch.
That's all righ
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 11:45:29AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've pushed out a new -next and testing tree. Highlights:
> - first batch of hsw enabling (Eugeni)
> - first batch of vlv enabling (Jesse and others)
> - a few cleanups spurred by the above items
> - pwrite/pread rework a
Hi all,
I've pushed out a new -next and testing tree. Highlights:
- first batch of hsw enabling (Eugeni)
- first batch of vlv enabling (Jesse and others)
- a few cleanups spurred by the above items
- pwrite/pread rework and speedups
- less mappable pressure and reloc optimizations (Chris)
- mmap_o
Hi all,
We finished new round Kernel testing. We covered both mobile and desktop
machines on platforms IVB, SNB, ILK, GM965 and PNV.
The Kernel the latest on -testing branch Daniel's tree:
commit 0028cac2e9e91961384ac15aae4196eee0faf4f6
Merge: 121d527 b250da7
Author: Daniel Vetter
Date: Fri
Hi all,
I've pushed out an updated -next and -testing tree. Highlights:
- more decoupling of ppgtt and global gtt.
- shut up the compiler (Ben)
- a bunch of minor quirks and fixlets, accompanied with quite a few module
options to ease debuggin (and adding new entries to these for these new
qui
Hi Dave,
QA beat on the -next tree in my absence and filed 3 new issue. Afaict
they're all new sightings of old issues (hooray for improved test-suites)
safe for a very funky sporadic failure on ilk - investigation is still
going on this one.
Otherwise the missed irq on snb poped up again, but Be
New round Kernel testing is finished. This time we covered the platform IVB,
SNB, ILK, G45, PNV.
The kernel commit is:
Kernel: (drm-intel-testing) 9c5a1897768918a941aebbeaefd9f698358c7cf9
Merge: c501ae7 108b0d3
Author: Daniel Vetter
Date: Thu Mar 1 21:47:53 2012 +0100
Merge remote-tracking
Hi all,
I've just pushed out update -next and -testing trees. Highlights:
- gmbus fixes, gmbus is now again enabled by default.
- random smaller fixes.
... so not too much this time around. For the 3.4 I think we should now
slowly wind down, of the big outstanding patch series I think only the
pw
A new round of Kernel testing is finished. We covered the platforms IvyBridge,
SandyBridge, IronLake, G33 and PineView.
We use the latest version on drm-intel-testing branch:
Kernel: (drm-intel-testing)de67cba65944f26c0f147035bd62e30c5f456b96
Some additional commit info:
Author: Danny Kukawka
Dat
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:27:44 +0100
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Updated -next and -testing trees. I haven't merged in any of the patches
> Jesse queued up because he hasn't yet pushed out his latest -fixes tree.
> No cookies for Jesse today!
wtf I swear I pushed that branch, I even pushed
Hi all,
Updated -next and -testing trees. I haven't merged in any of the patches
Jesse queued up because he hasn't yet pushed out his latest -fixes tree.
No cookies for Jesse today!
Highlights:
- interlaced support for i915. Again thanks a lot to all the ppl who help
out with testing, patches a
Hi all,
I've just pushed out an updated -next tree. Highlights:
- MI_WTF patches from Eric
- ilk/dmar workaround recursion fix from Ben
- pwrite/read EFAULT fixes for gtt userspace pointers
- error_state rework and extension (still more to come here) and some
debugfs refactoring to make that eas
Graphics Development
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] Updated -next
>
> On 2012-01-21 15:12+0100 Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > drm-intel-testing is drm-intel-next and drm-intel-fixes merged together
> > (as the time of when I've pushed things out). Gordon Jin said that he
> &g
On 2012-01-21 15:12+0100 Daniel Vetter wrote:
drm-intel-testing is drm-intel-next and drm-intel-fixes merged together
(as the time of when I've pushed things out). Gordon Jin said that he
prefers to qa one single branch and that qa will take the job of finding
out whether an issue has been intro
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 04:15:40AM +, Sun, Yi wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Not much in the first -next update under the new process, I'd like to
> > tests the qa process first. Highligths:
> > - first part of i9xx_crtc_mode_set refactor from Jesse
> > - quite a few ajax-is-paranoid patches
> > -
> Hi all,
>
> Not much in the first -next update under the new process, I'd like to
> tests the qa process first. Highligths:
> - first part of i9xx_crtc_mode_set refactor from Jesse
> - quite a few ajax-is-paranoid patches
> - HAS_LLC param from Eugeni
> - kill i915_mem.c
>
> For easier testing
Hi all,
Not much in the first -next update under the new process, I'd like to
tests the qa process first. Highligths:
- first part of i9xx_crtc_mode_set refactor from Jesse
- quite a few ajax-is-paranoid patches
- HAS_LLC param from Eugeni
- kill i915_mem.c
For easier testing there's also an upda
31 matches
Mail list logo
