Re: [Intel-gfx] Unexpected behaviour of xrandr and the Intel driver on monitor hotplug

2010-05-18 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 18:07 +0100, Simon Farnsworth wrote: > On Tuesday 18 May 2010, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 12:13 +0100, Simon Farnsworth wrote: > > > The first bit of misbehaviour I'm seeing is caching of EDID across > > > hotplug events. If I boot my system with no display

Re: [Intel-gfx] Unexpected behaviour of xrandr and the Intel driver on monitor hotplug

2010-05-18 Thread Simon Farnsworth
On Tuesday 18 May 2010, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 12:13 +0100, Simon Farnsworth wrote: > > The first bit of misbehaviour I'm seeing is caching of EDID across > > hotplug events. If I boot my system with no display attached, I > > correctly see no EDID property. When I connect a m

Re: [Intel-gfx] Unexpected behaviour of xrandr and the Intel driver on monitor hotplug

2010-05-18 Thread Adam Jackson
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 12:13 +0100, Simon Farnsworth wrote: > The first bit of misbehaviour I'm seeing is caching of EDID across hotplug > events. If I boot my system with no display attached, I correctly see no EDID > property. When I connect a monitor via VGA, using cabling that supports DDC, I >

[Intel-gfx] Unexpected behaviour of xrandr and the Intel driver on monitor hotplug

2010-05-17 Thread Simon Farnsworth
Hello, Before I file bugs, I'd like to check that the behaviour I'm seeing is unexpected. In all testing, I'm on an Intel 945 platform, running Fedora 12 for most of the stack (including the kernel), but with recent git master of xserver, xf86-video-intel, libdrm and mesa. In all cases, I'm testi