esktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] Tizen IVI EFI 3.0 graphics failure with FSP/OTM on
Bayley Bay
The "drm_kms_helper" function is mentioned only because the kernel is switching
back to the text console when the panic occurs. It's not actually the source
of the panic.
The graphics d
ani Nikula
> Cc: Wang, Stephanie; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] Tizen IVI EFI 3.0 graphics failure with FSP/OTM on
> Bayley Bay
>
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:47:03 +0200
> Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> >
> > FWIW there's nothing in the lo
org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] Tizen IVI EFI 3.0 graphics failure with FSP/OTM on
Bayley Bay
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:47:03 +0200
Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> FWIW there's nothing in the logs indicating it's a "graphics failure".
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
> On Fr
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:47:03 +0200
Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> FWIW there's nothing in the logs indicating it's a "graphics failure".
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
> On Fri, 25 Oct 2013, "Wang, Stephanie" wrote:
> > [4.354140] rtc_cmos 00:00: alarms up to one month, y3k, 242 bytes
> > nvram, hpet irqs
FWIW there's nothing in the logs indicating it's a "graphics failure".
BR,
Jani.
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013, "Wang, Stephanie" wrote:
> Jesse, hey
> I work for ISG FSP/OTM boot loader team under Khadker Islam. I've recently
> run into an issue that blocks FSP/OTM from supporting Tizen IVI 3.0 runnin
Jesse, hey
I work for ISG FSP/OTM boot loader team under Khadker Islam. I've recently run
into an issue that blocks FSP/OTM from supporting Tizen IVI 3.0 running Bay
Trail B3 silicon on Bayley Bay board.
Log file with the failure is attached. The failure is very consistent, happens
every time wi
