At Sun, 18 Mar 2012 19:01:21 +0100,
Andreas Heider wrote:
>
> Am 18.03.2012 um 18:50 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:29:24PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >> At Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:55:52 -0400,
> >> Adam Jackson wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 3/15/12 10:42 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >>
At Sun, 18 Mar 2012 18:50:31 +0100,
Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:29:24PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:55:52 -0400,
> > Adam Jackson wrote:
> > >
> > > On 3/15/12 10:42 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_di
Am 18.03.2012 um 18:50 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:29:24PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>> At Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:55:52 -0400,
>> Adam Jackson wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3/15/12 10:42 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
b/drivers/g
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:29:24PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:55:52 -0400,
> Adam Jackson wrote:
> >
> > On 3/15/12 10:42 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > index f851db7.
At Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:55:52 -0400,
Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> On 3/15/12 10:42 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index f851db7..314af26 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drive
On 3/15/12 10:42 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index f851db7..314af26 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -356,6 +356,23 @@ static const intel_limit_t
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:30:35 +0100,
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>
>> At Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:25:08 +,
>> Chris Wilson wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:15:54 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>> > > +static bool is_d
At Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:30:35 +0100,
Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> At Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:25:08 +,
> Chris Wilson wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:15:54 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > +static bool is_dual_link_lvds(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > > +{
> > > + /* BIOS should set the pr
At Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:25:08 +,
Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:15:54 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > +static bool is_dual_link_lvds(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > +{
> > + /* BIOS should set the proper LVDS register value at boot, but
> > +* in reality, it doesn't
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:15:54 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> +static bool is_dual_link_lvds(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> + /* BIOS should set the proper LVDS register value at boot, but
> + * in reality, it doesn't set the value when the lid is closed;
> + * thus when a mac
At Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:09:19 -0400,
Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 17:44 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:45:06 -0400,
> > Adam Jackson wrote:
> > > There may or may not be a bit for this in the VBT in the BIOS. But the
> > > more reliably correct thing I suspe
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 17:44 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:45:06 -0400,
> Adam Jackson wrote:
> > There may or may not be a bit for this in the VBT in the BIOS. But the
> > more reliably correct thing I suspect would be to just look at the
> > preferred mode for the panel and
At Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:45:06 -0400,
Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> [1.1 ]
> On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 13:37 +0100, Helge Bahmann wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Booting a Thinkpad T420 with the lid closed results and opening it
> > subsequently results in an
> > unusable picture on the panel (and
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 13:37 +0100, Helge Bahmann wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Booting a Thinkpad T420 with the lid closed results and opening it
> subsequently results in an
> unusable picture on the panel (and no amount of resetting makes it usable):
> The even pixels show
> the nominal content
Hi everyone,
Booting a Thinkpad T420 with the lid closed results and opening it subsequently
results in an
unusable picture on the panel (and no amount of resetting makes it usable): The
even pixels show
the nominal content of the framebuffer (with the right half missing) whlie the
odd pixels
15 matches
Mail list logo